» Articles » PMID: 18355913

The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial B of Radiotherapy Hypofractionation for Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: a Randomised Trial

Overview
Journal Lancet
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2008 Mar 22
PMID 18355913
Citations 329
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The international standard radiotherapy schedule for early breast cancer delivers 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2.0 Gy over 5 weeks, but there is a long history of non-standard regimens delivering a lower total dose using fewer, larger fractions (hypofractionation). We aimed to test the benefits of radiotherapy schedules using fraction sizes larger than 2.0 Gy in terms of local-regional tumour control, normal tissue responses, quality of life, and economic consequences in women prescribed post-operative radiotherapy.

Methods: Between 1999 and 2001, 2215 women with early breast cancer (pT1-3a pN0-1 M0) at 23 centres in the UK were randomly assigned after primary surgery to receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2.0 Gy over 5 weeks or 40 Gy in 15 fractions of 2.67 Gy over 3 weeks. Women were eligible for the trial if they were aged over 18 years, did not have an immediate reconstruction, and were available for follow-up. Randomisation method was computer generated and was not blinded. The protocol-specified principal endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse, defined as reappearance of cancer at irradiated sites, late normal tissue effects, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779.

Findings: 1105 women were assigned to the 50 Gy group and 1110 to the 40 Gy group. After a median follow up of 6.0 years (IQR 5.0-6.2) the rate of local-regional tumour relapse at 5 years was 2.2% (95% CI 1.3-3.1) in the 40 Gy group and 3.3% (95% CI 2.2 to 4.5) in the 50 Gy group, representing an absolute difference of -0.7% (95% CI -1.7% to 0.9%)--ie, the absolute difference in local-regional relapse could be up to 1.7% better and at most 1% worse after 40 Gy than after 50 Gy. Photographic and patient self-assessments indicated lower rates of late adverse effects after 40 Gy than after 50 Gy.

Interpretation: A radiation schedule delivering 40 Gy in 15 fractions seems to offer rates of local-regional tumour relapse and late adverse effects at least as favourable as the standard schedule of 50 Gy in 25 fractions.

Citing Articles

Sequential or simultaneous-integrated boost in early-stage breast cancer patients: trade-offs between skin toxicity and risk of compromised coverage.

Zhong C, Huang M, Yu H, Yuan J, Xie R, Lai Z Radiat Oncol. 2025; 20(1):10.

PMID: 39833842 PMC: 11744842. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02584-0.


Therapeutic Management in Elderly Male Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.

Di Rito A, Grillo A, Carbonara R Curr Oncol Rep. 2025; 27(2):120-134.

PMID: 39826033 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01629-z.


Size Matters: Predicting Surgical Site Infection After Whole Breast Radiotherapy in the Era of Hypofractionation.

Lee S, Kim Y, Song J, Yu M, Rhu J, Paik P J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797265 PMC: 11720973. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010184.


Guiding Sole Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer According to ASTRO Guidelines: Mitigating Adverse Outcomes in a Taiwan Single-Center.

Yang H, Tsang Y, Tu C, Hsu Y Cancer Med. 2024; 14(1):e70537.

PMID: 39739750 PMC: 11683544. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70537.


Navigating through recent evidence on locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy: an initiative by the scientific association of Swiss radiation oncology.

Tsoutsou P, Eberhardt A, Gruber G, Henke G, Jeannerret-Sozzi W, Linsenmeier C Strahlenther Onkol. 2024; 201(2):93-105.

PMID: 39643658 PMC: 11754371. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02332-5.


References
1.
Yamada Y, Ackerman I, Franssen E, MacKenzie R, Thomas G . Does the dose fractionation schedule influence local control of adjuvant radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 44(1):99-104. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00507-0. View

2.
Ash D, Benson E, Sainsbury J, Round C, Head C . Seven-year follow-up on 334 patients treated by breast conserving surgery and short course radical postoperative radiotherapy: a report of the Yorkshire Breast Cancer Group. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1995; 7(2):93-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0936-6555(05)80808-8. View

3.
Altman D, Andersen P . Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event. BMJ. 1999; 319(7223):1492-5. PMC: 1117211. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1492. View

4.
Fisher B, Costantino J, Redmond C, Fisher E, MARGOLESE R, Dimitrov N . Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328(22):1581-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199306033282201. View

5.
Venables K, Miles E, Aird E, Hoskin P . What is the optimum breast plan: a study based on the START trial plans. Br J Radiol. 2006; 79(945):734-9. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/80814021. View