Does the Nonunion Rate of Atypical Femoral Fractures Differ According to Fracture Site?: A Meta-Analysis

Overview

Journal Clin Orthop Surg

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Aug 2

PMID 39092299

Authors

Byung-Ho Yoon

Minsub Kim

Young Hak Roh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The nonunion rate for atypical femoral fractures (AFF) is known to be higher than that for typical fractures of the femur. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the incidence of nonunion necessitating reoperation following fixation for AFF and compare the rates according to the fracture site (subtrochanter or midshaft).

Methods: A total of 742 AFFs from 29 studies were included. A proportion meta-analysis utilizing a random-effects model was conducted to estimate the prevalence of nonunion. The outcomes were the incidence of reoperations that included osteosynthesis. To determine the association of nonunion with patient mean age or average duration of bisphosphonate use, meta-regression analysis was done.

Results: In proportion meta-analysis, the estimated pooled prevalence of nonunion was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-10%) from all studies. There was a significant difference in nonunion rate between the 2 groups (I = 34.4%, = 0.02); the estimated prevalence of nonunion was 15% (95% CI, 10%-20%) in subtrochanteric AFFs and 4% (95% CI, 2%-6%) in midshaft AFFs. From meta-regression analysis, significant correlations were identified between nonunion rate and patient mean age (coefficient: -0.0071, = 0.010), but not in the average duration of bisphosphonate use (coefficient: -0.0024, = 0.744).

Conclusions: A notable disparity existed in the nonunion rate among subtrochanteric AFFs and midshaft AFFs group. Therefore, it is critical for orthopedic surgeons to consider the complexity and challenges associated with AFF and to estimate the proper possibility of nonunion according to the fracture site.

References

Teo B, Koh J, Goh S, Png M, Chua D, Howe T . Post-operative outcomes of atypical femoral subtrochanteric fracture in patients on bisphosphonate therapy. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(5):658-64. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.32887. View

Nakken E, Achor T, Berkes M . Medialized Trochanteric Entry Nailing Is a Safe and Effective Method for High-Energy Subtrochanteric Femur Fracture Treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 2022; 36(12):458-462. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002418. View

Park K, Lee K . Sequential subtrochanteric femoral fracture after atypical diaphyseal fracture in a long-term bisphosphonate user: a case report. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015; 82(2):157-60. View

Caglar C, Akcaalan S, Bozer M, Akkaya M . Adult Proximal Humeral Locking Plate Is a Good Alternative Option in the Treatment of Adolescent Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Case Series and Literature Review. Hip Pelvis. 2023; 34(4):245-254. PMC: 9763829. DOI: 10.5371/hp.2022.34.4.245. View

Byun S, Cho Y, Lee Y, Park J, Kim S, Koo K . Straight nail insertion through a laterally shifted entry for diaphyseal atypical femoral fractures with bowing: good indications and limitations of this technique. Int Orthop. 2021; 45(12):3223-3232. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05212-0. View

Xu G, Li J, Xu C, Xiong D, Li H, Wang D . Triangular Mechanical Structure of the Proximal Femur. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(11):3047-3060. PMC: 9627078. DOI: 10.1111/os.13498. View

Mizutani Y, Horiuchi H, Nakamura Y, Mochizuki M, Kotoda Y, Toyata T . Post-operative Rehabilitation of Atypical Femoral Fracture in a Single Center. Prog Rehabil Med. 2020; 5:20200007. PMC: 7369319. DOI: 10.2490/prm.20200007. View

Phillips H, Harrison S, Akrawi H, Sidhom S . Retrospective review of patients with atypical bisphosphonate related proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 2017; 48(6):1159-1164. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.025. View

Cho Y, Byun Y, Jo S, Shin J . Plate Fixation for Atypical Fractures of the Femoral Diaphysis. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(2):178-183. PMC: 9152895. DOI: 10.4055/cios21173. View

10.

Zenke Y, Ikeda S, Fukuda F, Tanaka M, Tanaka H, Hirano F . Study of Atypical Femoral Fracture Cases Coupled in a Multicenter Study. J UOEH. 2016; 38(3):207-14. DOI: 10.7888/juoeh.38.207. View

11.

Nho J, Jang B, Lee D, Kim J, Lim T, Cha S . Position Statement: Atypical Femoral Fracture from the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research in 2023. J Bone Metab. 2023; 30(3):209-217. PMC: 10509028. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2023.30.3.209. View

12.

Weil Y, Rivkin G, Safran O, Liebergall M, Foldes A . The outcome of surgically treated femur fractures associated with long-term bisphosphonate use. J Trauma. 2011; 71(1):186-90. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821957e3. View

13.

Kim J, Kim H, Oh C, Kim J, Shon O, Byun Y . Surgical outcomes of intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal atypical femur fractures: is it safe to modify a nail entry in bowed femur?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017; 137(11):1515-1522. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2764-1. View

14.

Sahin K, Ergin O, Bayram S, Akgul T . Atypical femoral fractures related to bisphosphonate use: A comprehensive review of 19 patients. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019; 25(6):603-610. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.46595. View

15.

Nishino T, Hyodo K, Matsumoto Y, Yanagisawa Y, Yoshizawa T, Yamazaki M . Surgical results of atypical femoral fractures in long-term bisphosphonate and glucocorticoid users - Relationship between fracture reduction and bone union. J Orthop. 2020; 19:143-149. PMC: 6997664. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.044. View

16.

Lee K, Yoo J, Oh K, Yoo J, Rhyu K, Nam K . Surgical outcome of intramedullary nailing in patients with complete atypical femoral fracture: A multicenter retrospective study. Injury. 2017; 48(4):941-945. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.036. View

17.

Canbek U, Akgun U, Aydogan N . Efficacy of bone-end intervention on fracture healing in bisphosphonate-related atypical femoral fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019; 106(1):77-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.07.028. View

18.

De Cicco A, Toro G, Oliva F, Tarantino U, Panni A, Maffulli N . Atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures of the hip: A PRISMA compliant systematic review. Injury. 2021; 52(8):2407-2414. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.042. View

19.

Genest F, Seefried L . Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in hypophosphatasia-not atypical at all. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 29(8):1815-1825. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4552-3. View

20.

Rocos B, Fleming T, Harding K, Acharya M, Riddick A, Kelly M . A Case Series and Discussion on Surgical Treatment Strategy for Atypical Proximal Femoral Fractures Associated with Bisphosphonate Use. Cureus. 2019; 10(12):e3670. PMC: 6364955. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3670. View