» Articles » PMID: 31701502

Atypical Femoral Fractures Related to Bisphosphonate Use: A Comprehensive Review of 19 Patients

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 9
PMID 31701502
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Atypical femur fracture is a rare complication of bisphosphonate treatment, which is widely used for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures. This study aims to report clinical and radiological features and outcomes of surgically treated atypical femur fractures related to bisphosphonates.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with the diagnosis of atypical femur fracture who were under bisphosphonate treatment and who were surgically treated in our clinic between January 2009 and December 2017. Patients who met the atypical femur fracture criteria defined by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research were included in this study. Radiological features of the fractures, bisphosphonate treatment and duration, prodromal clinical and radiological findings were evaluated. Outcome measures included perioperative results, clinical and radiological outcomes and mobilization status.

Results: In this study, 19 patients were enrolled. Mean age of the patients was 69.6 years (range: 60.8-85.1) and the mean follow-up was 33.8 months (range: 13-104). Mean bisphosphonate use duration was 8.65 years (range: 3-18). Four patients had bilateral fractures. Eight of 23 fractures were subtrochanteric and 15 were diaphyseal. Twenty-one fractures were treated with an intramedullary nail, one fracture with a locked compression plate and one fracture with cephalomedullary nail. Union was observed in 15 fractures within the first six months. There was a delayed union in four fractures and non-union in four fractures. Mean union time was 5.1 months (range: 2-9). While seven patients preserved their preoperative mobilization status, 12 patients showed regression after the fracture.

Conclusion: This study suggests that atypical femur fractures may have prodromal signs and that their management is complex due to high complication and nonunion rates.

Citing Articles

Does the Nonunion Rate of Atypical Femoral Fractures Differ According to Fracture Site?: A Meta-Analysis.

Yoon B, Kim M, Roh Y Clin Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(4):533-541.

PMID: 39092299 PMC: 11262951. DOI: 10.4055/cios23386.


Bilateral Atypical Femoral Fractures after Bisphosphonate Treatment for Osteoporosis: A Literature Review.

Hwang S, Seo M, Lim D, Choi M, Park J, Nam K J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36769684 PMC: 9917519. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031038.


Plate osteosynthesis for atypical femoral fractures in patients with severely bowed femurs: comparing short versus long segment fixation - a case series.

Kwan Y, Shuy Y, Shi C, Ng A Int J Burns Trauma. 2022; 12(3):73-82.

PMID: 35891970 PMC: 9301159.


Surgical Treatment for Bisphosphonate-related Atypical Femoral Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Ebrahimpour A, Sadighi M, Hoveidaei A, Chehrassan M, Minaei R, Vahedi H Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021; 9(3):283-296.

PMID: 34239955 PMC: 8221447. DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2020.52698.2608.


Histopathological Finding of Microdamage Accumulation in Atypical Subtrochanteric Femoral Fracture.

Watanabe Y, Kondo N, Fukuhara T, Imai N, Yamada M, Endo N Case Rep Orthop. 2021; 2021:6624414.

PMID: 33824769 PMC: 8007382. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6624414.