» Articles » PMID: 39088474

Control of Complex Systems with Generalized Embedding and Empirical Dynamic Modeling

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Aug 1
PMID 39088474
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Effective control requires knowledge of the process dynamics to guide the system toward desired states. In many control applications this knowledge is expressed mathematically or through data-driven models, however, as complexity grows obtaining a satisfactory mathematical representation is increasingly difficult. Further, many data-driven approaches consist of abstract internal representations that may have no obvious connection to the underlying dynamics and control, or, require extensive model design and training. Here, we remove these constraints by demonstrating model predictive control from generalized state space embedding of the process dynamics providing a data-driven, explainable method for control of nonlinear, complex systems. Generalized embedding and model predictive control are demonstrated on nonlinear dynamics generated by an agent based model of 1200 interacting agents. The method is generally applicable to any type of controller and dynamic system representable in a state space.

Citing Articles

Causal interaction of metabolic oscillations in monolayers of Hela cervical cancer cells: emergence of complex networks.

Amemiya T, Shuto S, Fujita I, Shibata K, Nakamura K, Watanabe M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7423.

PMID: 40032965 PMC: 11876358. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91711-8.

References
1.
Cornelius S, Kath W, Motter A . Realistic control of network dynamics. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:1942. PMC: 3955710. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2939. View

2.
Brunton S, Brunton B, Proctor J, Kaiser E, Kutz J . Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):19. PMC: 5449398. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00030-8. View

3.
Sugihara G, May R . Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series. Nature. 1990; 344(6268):734-41. DOI: 10.1038/344734a0. View

4.
Kaiser E, Kutz J, Brunton S . Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2019; 474(2219):20180335. PMC: 6283900. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2018.0335. View

5.
Tan E, Algar S, Correa D, Small M, Stemler T, Walker D . Selecting embedding delays: An overview of embedding techniques and a new method using persistent homology. Chaos. 2023; 33(3):032101. DOI: 10.1063/5.0137223. View