» Articles » PMID: 39087881

Cortical-subcortical Interactions Underlie Processing of Auditory Predictions Measured with 7T FMRI

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Aug 1
PMID 39087881
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Perception integrates both sensory inputs and internal models of the environment. In the auditory domain, predictions play a critical role because of the temporal nature of sounds. However, the precise contribution of cortical and subcortical structures in these processes and their interaction remain unclear. It is also unclear whether these brain interactions are specific to abstract rules or if they also underlie the predictive coding of local features. We used high-field 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate interactions between cortical and subcortical areas during auditory predictive processing. Volunteers listened to tone sequences in an oddball paradigm where the predictability of the deviant was manipulated. Perturbations in periodicity were also introduced to test the specificity of the response. Results indicate that both cortical and subcortical auditory structures encode high-order predictive dynamics, with the effect of predictability being strongest in the auditory cortex. These predictive dynamics were best explained by modeling a top-down information flow, in contrast to unpredicted responses. No error signals were observed to deviations of periodicity, suggesting that these responses are specific to abstract rule violations. Our results support the idea that the high-order predictive dynamics observed in subcortical areas propagate from the auditory cortex.

References
1.
Peirce J, Gray J, Simpson S, Macaskill M, Hochenberger R, Sogo H . PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behav Res Methods. 2019; 51(1):195-203. PMC: 6420413. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y. View

2.
Coffey E, Nicol T, White-Schwoch T, Chandrasekaran B, Krizman J, Skoe E . Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):5036. PMC: 6834633. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13003-w. View

3.
Cacciaglia R, Escera C, Slabu L, Grimm S, Sanjuan A, Ventura-Campos N . Involvement of the human midbrain and thalamus in auditory deviance detection. Neuropsychologia. 2015; 68:51-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.001. View

4.
Wolff A, Berberian N, Golesorkhi M, Gomez-Pilar J, Zilio F, Northoff G . Intrinsic neural timescales: temporal integration and segregation. Trends Cogn Sci. 2022; 26(2):159-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.11.007. View

5.
Carbajal G, Malmierca M . The Neuronal Basis of Predictive Coding Along the Auditory Pathway: From the Subcortical Roots to Cortical Deviance Detection. Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216518784822. PMC: 6053868. DOI: 10.1177/2331216518784822. View