» Articles » PMID: 39066709

Assessing Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Fish Fillet Using Non-Targeted Analyses

Overview
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39066709
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of thousands of man-made chemicals that are persistent and highly stable in the environment. Fish consumption has been identified as a key route of PFAS exposure for humans. However, routine fish monitoring targets only a handful of PFAS, and non-targeted analyses have largely only evaluated fish from heavily PFAS-impacted waters. Here, we evaluated PFAS in fish fillets from recreational and drinking water sources in central North Carolina to assess whether PFAS are present in these fillets that would not be detected by conventional targeted methods. We used liquid chromatography, ion mobility spectrometry, and mass spectrometry (LC-IMS-MS) to collect full scan feature data, performed suspect screening using an in-house library of 100 PFAS for high confidence feature identification, searched for additional PFAS features using non-targeted data analyses, and quantified perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in the fillet samples. A total of 36 PFAS were detected in the fish fillets, including 19 that would not be detected using common targeted methods, with a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 22 in individual fish. Median fillet PFOS levels were concerningly high at 11.6 to 42.3 ppb, and no significant correlation between PFOS levels and number of PFAS per fish was observed. Future PFAS monitoring in this region should target more of these 36 PFAS, and other regions not considered heavily PFAS contaminated should consider incorporating non-targeted analyses into ongoing fish monitoring studies.

Citing Articles

Challenges in PFAS Postdegradation Analysis: Insights from the PFAS-CTAB Model System.

Navarathna C, Boateng R, Luo L ACS Meas Sci Au. 2025; 5(1):135-144.

PMID: 39991032 PMC: 11843502. DOI: 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00083.


Updated Guidance for Communicating PFAS Identification Confidence with Ion Mobility Spectrometry.

Boatman A, Chappel J, Kirkwood-Donelson K, Fleming J, Reif D, Schymanski E bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975284 PMC: 11838322. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.27.634925.

References
1.
Pickard H, Ruyle B, Thackray C, Chovancova A, Dassuncao C, Becanova J . PFAS and Precursor Bioaccumulation in Freshwater Recreational Fish: Implications for Fish Advisories. Environ Sci Technol. 2022; 56(22):15573-15583. PMC: 9670858. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03734. View

2.
Barnes D, Dourson M . Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health risk assessments. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1988; 8(4):471-86. DOI: 10.1016/0273-2300(88)90047-5. View

3.
Phillips A, Peter K, Sobus J, Fisher C, Manzano C, McEachran A . Standardizing non-targeted analysis reporting to advance exposure science and environmental epidemiology. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2023; 33(4):501-504. PMC: 10631379. DOI: 10.1038/s41370-022-00490-1. View

4.
Marvel S, To K, Grimm F, Wright F, Rusyn I, Reif D . ToxPi Graphical User Interface 2.0: Dynamic exploration, visualization, and sharing of integrated data models. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018; 19(1):80. PMC: 5838926. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2089-2. View

5.
Brennan N, Evans A, Fritz M, Peak S, von Holst H . Trends in the Regulation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(20). PMC: 8536021. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182010900. View