» Articles » PMID: 33201517

PFAS Exposure Pathways for Humans and Wildlife: A Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Key Gaps in Understanding

Abstract

We synthesize current understanding of the magnitudes and methods for assessing human and wildlife exposures to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Most human exposure assessments have focused on 2 to 5 legacy PFAS, and wildlife assessments are typically limited to targeted PFAS (up to ~30 substances). However, shifts in chemical production are occurring rapidly, and targeted methods for detecting PFAS have not kept pace with these changes. Total fluorine measurements complemented by suspect screening using high-resolution mass spectrometry are thus emerging as essential tools for PFAS exposure assessment. Such methods enable researchers to better understand contributions from precursor compounds that degrade into terminal perfluoroalkyl acids. Available data suggest that diet is the major human exposure pathway for some PFAS, but there is large variability across populations and PFAS compounds. Additional data on total fluorine in exposure media and the fraction of unidentified organofluorine are needed. Drinking water has been established as the major exposure source in contaminated communities. As water supplies are remediated, for the general population, exposures from dust, personal care products, indoor environments, and other sources may be more important. A major challenge for exposure assessments is the lack of statistically representative population surveys. For wildlife, bioaccumulation processes differ substantially between PFAS and neutral lipophilic organic compounds, prompting a reevaluation of traditional bioaccumulation metrics. There is evidence that both phospholipids and proteins are important for the tissue partitioning and accumulation of PFAS. New mechanistic models for PFAS bioaccumulation are being developed that will assist in wildlife risk evaluations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:631-657. © 2020 SETAC.

Citing Articles

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances as forever chemicals in drinking water: Unraveling the nexus with obesity and endocrine disruption - A mini review.

Pezeshki H, Rajabi S, Hashemi M, Moradalizadeh S, Nasab H Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42782.

PMID: 40066031 PMC: 11891678. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42782.


Interplay Between Pollution and Avian Influenza Virus in Shorebirds and Waterfowl.

Ross T, Zhang J, Wille M, Asimakopoulos A, Jaspers V, Klaassen M Ecohealth. 2025; .

PMID: 40053250 DOI: 10.1007/s10393-025-01707-z.


Assessing the utility of healthcare claims data to determine potential health impacts of PFAS exposure with public drinking water.

Namulanda G, Condon S, Palmer T, Ellis E, Yip F, Reh C Environ Epidemiol. 2025; 9(2):e368.

PMID: 40041203 PMC: 11878993. DOI: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000368.


Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in untreated and treated sludge/biosolids from 27 water resource recovery facilities across the United States and Canada.

Oza S, Li H, Huang Q, Norton J, Winchell L, Wells M Water Environ Res. 2025; 97(2):e70039.

PMID: 39988323 PMC: 11847621. DOI: 10.1002/wer.70039.


Whale baleen to monitor per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in marine environments.

Savoca M, Robuck A, Cashman M, Cantwell M, Agvent L, Wiley D Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2025; 11(8):862-870.

PMID: 39959431 PMC: 11824945. DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00409.


References
1.
Laitinen J, Koponen J, Koikkalainen J, Kiviranta H . Firefighters' exposure to perfluoroalkyl acids and 2-butoxyethanol present in firefighting foams. Toxicol Lett. 2014; 231(2):227-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.09.007. View

2.
Wang Y, Chang W, Wang L, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Wang M . A review of sources, multimedia distribution and health risks of novel fluorinated alternatives. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019; 182:109402. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109402. View

3.
Solo-Gabriele H, Jones A, Lindstrom A, Lang J . Waste type, incineration, and aeration are associated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl levels in landfill leachates. Waste Manag. 2020; 107:191-200. PMC: 8335518. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.034. View

4.
Cousins I, Goldenman G, Herzke D, Lohmann R, Miller M, Ng C . The concept of essential use for determining when uses of PFASs can be phased out. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2019; 21(11):1803-1815. PMC: 6992415. DOI: 10.1039/c9em00163h. View

5.
Paul A, Scheringer M, Hungerbuhler K, Loos R, Jones K, Sweetman A . Estimating the aquatic emissions and fate of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) into the river Rhine. J Environ Monit. 2011; 14(2):524-30. DOI: 10.1039/c1em10432b. View