» Articles » PMID: 39064590

The Application of Robotics in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39064590
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Robotics is commonly used in the rehabilitation of neuro-musculoskeletal injuries and diseases. While in these conditions, robotics has clear benefits, it is unknown whether robotics will also enhance the outcome of cardiac rehabilitation. This systematic review evaluates the use of robotics in cardiac rehabilitation. : A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, AMED, SPORTDiscus, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Longitudinal interventional studies were included if they met specified criteria. Two reviewers independently conducted title, abstract, and full-text screening and data extraction. The quality assessment and risk of bias were conducted according to the PEDRO scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2, respectively. : Four trials were included in this review out of 60 screened studies. The quality of the included studies was good with a low risk of bias. The trials used different robotic systems: Lokomat system, Motomed Letto/Thera Trainer tigo, BEAR, and Myosuit. It was found that interventions that included the use of robotic assistance technologies improved the exercise capacity, VO max/peak, left ventricular ejection fraction, QOL, and physical functioning in people with cardiac diseases. : Robotic assistance technologies can be used in cardiac rehabilitation programs. Further studies are needed to confirm the results and determine whether the use of robotics enhances intervention outcomes above standard interventions.

Citing Articles

ENIGMA-shock: protocol for a study framEwork for aN InteGrated assessMent of cArdiac rehabilitation programmes in patients acutely managed for cardiogenic shock.

Morici N, Foglia E, Ferrario L, Pedersini P, Corda M, Ravera A BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e092790.

PMID: 39938955 PMC: 11822428. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092790.

References
1.
Garcia-Bravo S, Cuesta-Gomez A, Campuzano-Ruiz R, Lopez-Navas M, Dominguez-Paniagua J, Araujo-Narvaez A . Virtual reality and video games in cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 43(4):448-457. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1631892. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
Hashimoto K, Hirashiki A, Ozaki K, Kawamura K, Sugioka J, Tanioku S . Benefits of a Balance Exercise Assist Robot in the Cardiac Rehabilitation of Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Preliminary Study. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022; 9(6). PMC: 9224750. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9060191. View

4.
Yamato T, Maher C, Koes B, Moseley A . The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 86:176-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.002. View

5.
Cespedes N, Irfan B, Senft E, Cifuentes C, Gutierrez L, Rincon-Roncancio M . A Socially Assistive Robot for Long-Term Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Real World. Front Neurorobot. 2021; 15:633248. PMC: 8020889. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.633248. View