» Articles » PMID: 39063353

Think and Choose! The Dual Impact of Label Information and Consumer Attitudes on the Choice of a Plant-Based Analog

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39063353
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explored the impact of various label information (extrinsic attributes) and sociodemographic and attitudinal factors (intrinsic attributes) on Brazilian consumer choices, using simulated traditional and plant-based muçarela cheese as the model product. The research was conducted in two phases: the first involved a structured questionnaire assessing attitudinal dimensions such as Health Consciousness, Climate Change, Plant-based Diets, and Food Neophobia, along with sociodemographic data collection. The second phase comprised a discrete choice experiment with (n = 52) and without (n = 509) eye tracking. The term "Cheese" on labels increased choice probability by 7.6% in a general survey and 15.1% in an eye tracking study. A prolonged gaze at "Cheese" did not affect choice, while more views of "Plant-based product" slightly raised choice likelihood by 2.5%. Repeatedly revisiting these terms reduced the choice probability by 3.7% for "Cheese" and 1% for "Plant-based product". Nutritional claims like "Source of Vitamins B6 and B12" and "Source of Proteins and Calcium" boosted choice probabilities by 4.97% and 5.69% in the general and 8.4% and 6.9% in the eye-tracking experiment, respectively. Conversely, front-of-package labeling indicating high undesirable nutrient content decreased choice by 13% for magnifying presentations and 15.6% for text. In a plant-based subsample, higher environmental concerns and openness to plant-based diets increased choice probabilities by 5.31% and 5.1%, respectively. These results highlight the complex dynamics between label information, consumer understanding, and decision-making.

Citing Articles

Utilizing Sensory and Visual Data in the Value Estimation of Extra Virgin Olive Oil.

Suurmets S, Clement J, Piras S, Barlagne C, Tura M, Mokhtari N Foods. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39335835 PMC: 11430995. DOI: 10.3390/foods13182904.

References
1.
Kozicka M, Havlik P, Valin H, Wollenberg E, Deppermann A, Leclere D . Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives. Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):5316. PMC: 10497520. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40899-2. View

2.
Ritchey P, Frank R, Hursti U, Tuorila H . Validation and cross-national comparison of the food neophobia scale (FNS) using confirmatory factor analysis. Appetite. 2003; 40(2):163-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(02)00134-4. View

3.
Determann D, Gyrd-Hansen D, de Wit G, de Bekker-Grob E, Steyerberg E, Lambooij M . Designing Unforced Choice Experiments to Inform Health Care Decision Making: Implications of Using Opt-Out, Neither, or Status Quo Alternatives in Discrete Choice Experiments. Med Decis Making. 2019; 39(6):681-692. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19862275. View

4.
Hannus V, Venus T, Sauer J . Acceptance of sustainability standards by farmers - empirical evidence from Germany. J Environ Manage. 2020; 267:110617. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110617. View

5.
Falkeisen A, Gorman M, Knowles S, Barker S, Moss R, McSweeney M . Consumer perception and emotional responses to plant-based cheeses. Food Res Int. 2022; 158:111513. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111513. View