» Articles » PMID: 39061488

What Is a Working Equid? Analysis of Current Terminology and a Suggested Definition

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39061488
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Equids are engaged in myriad types of work across the world, with contexts and industries varying widely between high-, middle- and low-income countries as classified by the World Bank. Through a comprehensive abstract search and literature review, we examined the usage and context of terms associated with working equids in high-income countries (HICs), upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), and low-income countries (LICs). Analysis showed that the search term used was significantly associated with World Bank country income classification. All search terms except two returned a significantly higher number of papers for higher-income countries compared to lower-income countries. The two exceptions were "working equid" and "draft equid", which returned significantly more papers for lower-income countries than higher-income countries. Both terms also returned papers from high-income and upper-middle-income countries, but these were always in the context of low-resource settings and rural or marginalised communities, of which we provide examples in the discussion. We propose that the term "working equid" should be used to describe "any equid engaged in physical labour that provides a significant or direct contribution to the economic livelihood, sustenance or support of the owner/user's family, typically within a low resource setting". Our review highlights the intricate interplay between socioeconomic factors and examines how equids are described in the literature. The lack of a universally accepted definition leads to challenges in policy formulation, resource allocation, and welfare standards development, particularly in LMICs and LICs where working equids are crucial to livelihoods. This study underscores the need for a more inclusive and comprehensive approach to terminology, advocating for future research to bridge linguistic and cultural gaps in understanding working equids globally. Such efforts are vital for equitable and effective welfare standards and policy development for these animals.

Citing Articles

Comment on Ssuna et al. Animal Welfare Guidelines for International Development Organisations in the Global South. 2024, , 2012.

Hockenhull J, Burden F, Clancy C, Watson T, Kubasiewicz L Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682414 PMC: 11640354. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233446.


Stakeholder Views on the Potential Benefits and Feasibility of an Equestrian Industry-Specific Health, Safety and Welfare Management System.

Chapman M, Fenner K, Thomas M, Thompson K Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682412 PMC: 11640081. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233450.

References
1.
Kubasiewicz L, Watson T, Nye C, Chamberlain N, Perumal R, Saroja R . Bonded labour and donkey ownership in the brick kilns of India: A need for reform of policy and practice. Anim Welf. 2024; 32:e8. PMC: 10936255. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2023.1. View

2.
Geiger M, Hockenhull J, Buller H, Tefera Engida G, Getachew M, Burden F . Understanding the Attitudes of Communities to the Social, Economic, and Cultural Importance of Working Donkeys in Rural, Peri-urban, and Urban Areas of Ethiopia. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:60. PMC: 7033506. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00060. View

3.
Hogg R, Hodgins G . Symbiosis or Sporting Tool? Competition and the Horse-Rider Relationship in Elite Equestrian Sports. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(5). PMC: 8151029. DOI: 10.3390/ani11051352. View

4.
Kubasiewicz L, Watson T, Norris S, Chamberlain N, Nye C, Perumal R . Erratum: One welfare: Linking poverty, equid ownership and equid welfare in the brick kilns of India - ERRATUM. Anim Welf. 2024; 32:e15. PMC: 10936267. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2023.14. View

5.
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alunno A, Aringer M, Bajema I, Boletis J . 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 78(6):736-745. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215089. View