Defining Terms Used for Animals Working in Support Roles for People with Support Needs

The nomenclature used to describe animals working in roles supporting people can be confusing. The same term may be used to describe different roles, or two terms may mean the same thing. This confusion is evident among researchers, practitioners, and end users. Because certain animal roles are provided with legal protections and/or government-funding support in some jurisdictions, it is necessary to clearly define the existing terms to avoid confusion. The aim of this paper is to provide operationalized definitions for nine terms, which would be useful in many world regions: "assistance animal", "companion animal", "educational/school support animal", "emotional support animal", "facility animal", "service animal", "skilled companion animal", "therapy animal", and "visiting/visitation animal". At the International Society for Anthrozoology (ISAZ) conferences in 2018 and 2020, over 100 delegates participated in workshops to define these terms, many of whom co-authored this paper. Through an iterative process, we have defined the nine terms and explained how they differ from each other. We recommend phasing out two terms (i.e., "skilled companion animal" and "service animal") due to overlap with other terms that could potentially exacerbate confusion. The implications for several regions of the world are discussed.

Citing Articles

Factors Associated with Compassion Fatigue in Assistance Animal Trainers in Australia-A Qualitative Investigation.

Verrall J, Rohlf V, Howell T Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943107 PMC: 11816333. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030337.

An overview of the literature on assistance dogs using text mining and topic analysis.

Bassan E, Mair A, De Santis M, Bugianelli M, Loretti E, Capecci A Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1463332.

PMID: 39723180 PMC: 11669006. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1463332.

Barriers to finding and maintaining pet-inclusive affordable housing: Tenant experiences in Houston, Texas.

Mascitelli T, Graham T, Loney L, Applebaum J, Murray C, Binns-Calvey M Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1465682.

PMID: 39529854 PMC: 11551556. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1465682.

Impact of Interactions with a Puppy and Handler Versus a Handler Alone on Stress and Vitality in a University Setting: A Crossover Study.

Howell T, Mai D, Draganovic P, Binfet J, Bennett P Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272239 PMC: 11394264. DOI: 10.3390/ani14172454.

Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of animal-assisted activities with visiting dogs in inpatient pediatric oncology.

Steff K, Grasemann M, Ostermann K, Goretzki S, Rath P, Reinhardt D World J Pediatr. 2024; 20(9):915-924.

PMID: 39112809 PMC: 11422466. DOI: 10.1007/s12519-024-00829-8.

References

Kerman N, Lem M, Witte M, Kim C, Rhoades H . A Multilevel Intervention Framework for Supporting People Experiencing Homelessness with Pets. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(10). PMC: 7602009. DOI: 10.3390/ani10101869. View

Glenk L . Current Perspectives on Therapy Dog Welfare in Animal-Assisted Interventions. Animals (Basel). 2017; 7(2). PMC: 5332928. DOI: 10.3390/ani7020007. View

Phung A, Joyce C, Ambutas S, Browning M, Fogg L, Christopher B . Animal-assisted therapy for inpatient adults. Nursing. 2016; 47(1):63-66. DOI: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000504675.26722.d8. View

Mellor D . Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living". Animals (Basel). 2016; 6(3). PMC: 4810049. DOI: 10.3390/ani6030021. View

Clark S, Martin F, McGowan R, Smidt J, Anderson R, Wang L . Physiological State of Therapy Dogs during Animal-Assisted Activities in an Outpatient Setting. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(5). PMC: 7277909. DOI: 10.3390/ani10050819. View

Rodriguez K, Herzog H, Gee N . Variability in Human-Animal Interaction Research. Front Vet Sci. 2021; 7:619600. PMC: 7843787. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.619600. View

Parenti L, Foreman A, Meade B, Wirth O . A revised taxonomy of assistance animals. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50(6):745-56. PMC: 4540185. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.11.0216. View

Wood W, Alm K, Benjamin J, Thomas L, Anderson D, Pohl L . Optimal Terminology for Services in the United States That Incorporate Horses to Benefit People: A Consensus Document. J Altern Complement Med. 2020; 27(1):88-95. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2020.0415. View

Mellor D, Beausoleil N, Littlewood K, McLean A, McGreevy P, Jones B . The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human-Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(10). PMC: 7602120. DOI: 10.3390/ani10101870. View

10.

Mellor D . Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals (Basel). 2017; 7(8). PMC: 5575572. DOI: 10.3390/ani7080060. View

11.

Walther S, Yamamoto M, Thigpen A, Garcia A, Willits N, Hart L . Assistance Dogs: Historic Patterns and Roles of Dogs Placed by ADI or IGDF Accredited Facilities and by Non-Accredited U.S. Facilities. Front Vet Sci. 2017; 4:1. PMC: 5243836. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00001. View

12.

Linder D, Siebens H, Mueller M, Gibbs D, Freeman L . Animal-assisted interventions: A national survey of health and safety policies in hospitals, eldercare facilities, and therapy animal organizations. Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45(8):883-887. PMC: 5542869. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.04.287. View

13.

Cleary M, West S, Visentin D, Phipps M, Westman M, Vesk K . The Unbreakable Bond: The Mental Health Benefits and Challenges of Pet Ownership for People Experiencing Homelessness. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020; 42(8):741-746. DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2020.1843096. View

14.

Schoenfeld-Tacher R, Hellyer P, Cheung L, Kogan L . Public Perceptions of Service Dogs, Emotional Support Dogs, and Therapy Dogs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(6). PMC: 5486328. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14060642. View