» Articles » PMID: 39038919

Circulating T Cell Status and Molecular Imaging May Predict Clinical Benefit of Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade in Oral Cancer

Abstract

Background: Addition of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition to standard-of-care interventions for locally advanced oral cancer could improve clinical outcome.

Methods: In this study, 16 evaluable patients with stage III/IV oral cancer were treated with one dose of 480 mg nivolumab 3 weeks prior to surgery. Primary objectives were safety, feasibility, and suitability of programmed death receptor ligand-1 positron emission tomography (PD-L1 PET) as a biomarker for response. Imaging included F-BMS-986192 (PD-L1) PET and F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET before and after nivolumab treatment. Secondary objectives included clinical and pathological response, and immune profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for response prediction. Baseline tumor biopsies and postnivolumab resection specimens were evaluated by histopathology.

Results: Grade III or higher adverse events were not observed and treatment was not delayed in relation to nivolumab administration and other study procedures. Six patients (38%) had a pathological response, of whom three (19%) had a major (≥90%) pathological response (MPR). Tumor PD-L1 PET uptake (quantified using standard uptake value) was not statistically different in patients with or without MPR (median 5.3 vs 3.4). All major responders showed a significantly postnivolumab decreased signal on FDG PET. PBMC immune phenotyping showed higher levels of CD8 T cell activation in MPR patients, evidenced by higher baseline expression levels of PD-1, TIGIT, IFNγ and lower levels of PD-L1.

Conclusion: Together these data support that neoadjuvant treatment of advanced-stage oral cancers with nivolumab was safe and induced an MPR in a promising 19% of patients. Response was associated with decreased FDG PET uptake as well as activation status of peripheral T cell populations.

Citing Articles

Secretome and immune cell attraction analysis of head and neck cancers.

Muijlwijk T, Wondergem N, Ekhlas F, Remkes N, Nijenhuis D, Fritz L Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2024; 73(11):229.

PMID: 39249543 PMC: 11383899. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-024-03809-z.

References
1.
Ferris R, Blumenschein Jr G, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas A, Licitra L . Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(19):1856-1867. PMC: 5564292. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602252. View

2.
Desfrancois J, Moreau-Aubry A, Vignard V, Godet Y, Khammari A, Dreno B . Double positive CD4CD8 alphabeta T cells: a new tumor-reactive population in human melanomas. PLoS One. 2010; 5(1):e8437. PMC: 2797605. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008437. View

3.
Leemans C, Braakhuis B, Brakenhoff R . The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010; 11(1):9-22. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2982. View

4.
Niemeijer A, Leung D, Huisman M, Bahce I, Hoekstra O, van Dongen G . Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):4664. PMC: 6220188. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07131-y. View

5.
Kolinger G, Garcia D, Kramer G, Frings V, Smit E, de Langen A . Repeatability of [F]FDG PET/CT total metabolic active tumour volume and total tumour burden in NSCLC patients. EJNMMI Res. 2019; 9(1):14. PMC: 6367490. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-019-0481-1. View