» Articles » PMID: 39033213

A Systematic Review of Cell Therapy Modalities and Outcomes in Cerebral Palsy

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2024 Jul 20
PMID 39033213
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cerebral palsy is widely recognized as a condition that results in significant physical and cognitive disabilities. Interventions aim to improve the quality of life and reduce disability. Despite numerous treatments and significant advancements, cerebral palsy remains incurable due to its diverse origins. This review evaluated clinical trials, studies, and case reports on various cell therapy approaches for cerebral palsy. It assessed the clinical outcomes of applying different cell types, including mesenchymal stem cells, olfactory ensheathing cells, neural stem/progenitor cells, macrophages, and mononuclear cells derived from peripheral blood, cord blood, and bone marrow. In 60 studies involving 1474 CP patients, six major adverse events (0.41%) and 485 mild adverse events (32.9%) were reported. Favorable therapeutic effects were observed in 54 out of 60 cell therapy trials, indicating a promising potential for cell treatments in cerebral palsy. Intrathecal MSC and BM-MNC applications revealed therapeutic benefits, with MSC studies being generally safer than other cell therapies. However, MSC and BM-MNC trials have shown inconsistent results, with some demonstrating superior efficacy for certain outcomes. Cell dosage, transplantation route, and frequency of administration can affect the efficacy of these therapies. Our findings highlight the promise of cell therapies for improving cerebral palsy treatment and stress the need for ongoing research to refine treatment protocols and enhance safety. To establish conclusive evidence on the comparative effectiveness of various cell types in treating cerebral palsy, randomized, double-blind clinical trials are essential.

References
1.
Kirby R, Wingate M, Braun K, Doernberg N, Arneson C, Benedict R . Prevalence and functioning of children with cerebral palsy in four areas of the United States in 2006: a report from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. Res Dev Disabil. 2011; 32(2):462-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.042. View

2.
Christensen D, Braun K, Doernberg N, Maenner M, Arneson C, Durkin M . Prevalence of cerebral palsy, co-occurring autism spectrum disorders, and motor functioning - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, USA, 2008. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013; 56(1):59-65. PMC: 4351771. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12268. View

3.
Reid S, Meehan E, McIntyre S, Goldsmith S, Badawi N, Reddihough D . Temporal trends in cerebral palsy by impairment severity and birth gestation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016; 58 Suppl 2:25-35. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13001. View

4.
Zhang J, Oskoui M, Shevell M . A population-based study of communication impairment in cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2014; 30(3):277-84. DOI: 10.1177/0883073814538497. View

5.
Mei C, Reilly S, Reddihough D, Mensah F, Pennington L, Morgan A . Language outcomes of children with cerebral palsy aged 5 years and 6 years: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015; 58(6):605-11. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12957. View