» Articles » PMID: 38993285

Reduced Dose Helical CT Scout Imaging on Next Generation Wide Volume CT System Decreases Scan Length and Overall Radiation Exposure

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Jul 12
PMID 38993285
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Traditional CT acquisition planning is based on scout projection images from planar anterior-posterior and lateral projections where the radiographer estimates organ locations. Alternatively, a new scout method utilizing ultra-low dose helical CT (3D Landmark Scan) offers cross-sectional imaging to identify anatomic structures in conjunction with artificial intelligence based Anatomic Landmark Detection (ALD) for automatic CT acquisition planning. The purpose of this study is to quantify changes in scan length and radiation dose of CT examinations planned using 3D Landmark Scan and ALD and performed on next generation wide volume CT versus examinations planned using traditional scout methods. We additionally aim to quantify changes in radiation dose reduction of scans planned with 3D Landmark Scan and performed on next generation wide volume CT.

Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with prior CT scan of the same organ who underwent clinical CT using 3D Landmark Scan and automatic scan planning. Acquisition length and dose-length-product (DLP) were collected. Data was analyzed by paired t-tests.

Results: 104 total CT examinations (48.1 % chest, 15.4 % abdomen, 36.5 % chest/abdomen/pelvis) on 61 individual consecutive patients at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. 79.8 % of scans using 3D Landmark Scan had reduction in acquisition length compared to the respective prior acquisition. Median acquisition length using 3D Landmark Scan was 26.7 mm shorter than that using traditional scout methods (p < 0.001) with a 23.3 % median total radiation dose reduction (245.6 (IQR 150.0-400.8) mGy cm vs 320.3 (IQR 184.1-547.9) mGy cm). CT dose index similarly was overall decreased for scans planned with 3D Landmark and ALD and performed on next generation CT versus traditional methods (4.85 (IQR 3.8-7) mGy vs. 6.70 (IQR 4.43-9.18) mGy, respectively, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Scout imaging using reduced dose 3D Landmark Scan images and Anatomic Landmark Detection reduces acquisition range in chest, abdomen, and chest/abdomen/pelvis CT scans. This technology, in combination with next generation wide volume CT reduces total radiation dose.

Citing Articles

Comparison of ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided pulsed radiofrequency in treating ophthalmic branch postherpetic neuralgia: a retrospective study.

Shen Q, Wang B, Yu J, Xia J Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024; 70(11):e20241004.

PMID: 39536243 PMC: 11554317. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20241004.

References
1.
Campbell J, Kalra M, Rizzo S, Maher M, Shepard J . Scanning beyond anatomic limits of the thorax in chest CT: findings, radiation dose, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185(6):1525-30. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1512. View

2.
Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Kamath R, Halpern E, Saini S . Radiation from "extra" images acquired with abdominal and/or pelvic CT: effect of automatic tube current modulation. Radiology. 2004; 232(2):409-14. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2322031151. View

3.
May M, Heiss R, Koehnen J, Wetzl M, Wiesmueller M, Treutlein C . Personalized Chest Computed Tomography: Minimum Diagnostic Radiation Dose Levels for the Detection of Fibrosis, Nodules, and Pneumonia. Invest Radiol. 2021; 57(3):148-156. PMC: 8826613. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000822. View

4.
Yu L, Liu X, Leng S, Kofler J, Ramirez-Giraldo J, Qu M . Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med. 2012; 1(1):65-84. PMC: 3271708. DOI: 10.2217/iim.09.5. View

5.
Rehani M . Radiological protection in computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography. Ann ICRP. 2015; 44(1 Suppl):229-35. DOI: 10.1177/0146645315575872. View