» Articles » PMID: 38993246

Untapped Potential of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors: Lessons Learned From the Real-World Clinical Homologous Recombination Repair Mutation Testing

Abstract

Background: Testing for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) mutations is pivotal to assess individual risk, to proact preventive measures in healthy carriers and to tailor treatments for cancer patients. Increasing prominence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with remarkable impact on molecular-selected patient survival across diverse nosologies, ingrains testing for BRCA genes and beyond in clinical practice. Nevertheless, testing strategies remain a question of debate. While several pathogenic BRCA1/2 gene variants have been described as founder pathogenic mutations frequently found in patients from Russia, other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes have not been sufficiently explored. In this study, we present real-world data of routine HRR gene testing in Russia.

Methods: We evaluated clinical and sequencing data from cancer patients who had germline/somatic next-generation sequencing (NGS) HRR gene testing in Russia (BRCA1/2/ATM/CHEK2, or 15 HRR genes). The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the frequency of BRCA1/2 and non-BRCA gene mutations in real-world unselected patients from Russia, and to determine whether testing beyond BRCA1/2 is feasible.

Results: Data of 2,032 patients were collected from February 2021 to February 2023. Most had breast (n = 715, 35.2%), ovarian (n = 259, 12.7%), pancreatic (n = 85, 4.2%), or prostate cancer (n = 58, 2.9%). We observed 586 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and 372 deleterious variants (DVs) across 487 patients, with 17.6% HRR-mutation positivity. HRR testing identified 120 (11.8%) BRCA1/2-positive, and 172 (16.9%) HRR-positive patients. With 51 DVs identified in 242 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), testing for variant origin clarification was required in one case (0.4%). Most BRCA1/2 germline variants were DV (121 DVs, 26 VUS); in non-BRCA1/2 genes, VUS were ubiquitous (53 DVs, 132 VUS). prediction identified additional 4.9% HRR and 1.2% BRCA1/2/ATM/CHEK2 mutation patients.

Conclusions: Our study represents one of the first reports about the incidence of DV and VUS in HRR genes, including genes beyond BRCA1/2, identified in cancer patients from Russia, assessed by NGS. predictions of the observed HRR gene variants suggest that non-BRCA gene testing is likely to result in higher frequency of patients who are candidates for PARP inhibitor therapy. Continuing sequencing efforts should clarify interpretation of frequently observed non-BRCA VUS.

References
1.
Astiazaran-Symonds E, Kim J, Haley J, Kim S, Rao H, Center R . A Genome-First Approach to Estimate Prevalence of Germline Pathogenic Variants and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Select Cancer Susceptibility Genes. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(13). PMC: 9265005. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133257. View

2.
Kwon J, Tinker A, Santos J, Compton K, Sun S, Schrader K . Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022; 6:e2200033. PMC: 9616645. DOI: 10.1200/PO.22.00033. View

3.
Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, DeFazio A, Emmanuel C, George J . BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(21):2654-63. PMC: 3413277. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.8545. View

4.
Carter H, Douville C, Stenson P, Cooper D, Karchin R . Identifying Mendelian disease genes with the variant effect scoring tool. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14 Suppl 3:S3. PMC: 3665549. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-S3-S3. View

5.
Weber-Lassalle N, Hauke J, Ramser J, Richters L, Gross E, Blumcke B . BRIP1 loss-of-function mutations confer high risk for familial ovarian cancer, but not familial breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2018; 20(1):7. PMC: 5784717. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-018-0935-9. View