» Articles » PMID: 38965709

Electrodiagnostic Subtyping in Guillain-Barré Syndrome Patients in the International Guillain-Barré Outcome Study

Abstract

Background And Purpose: Various electrodiagnostic criteria have been developed in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Their performance in a broad representation of GBS patients has not been evaluated. Motor conduction data from the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS) cohort were used to compare two widely used criterion sets and relate these to diagnostic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis criteria.

Methods: From the first 1500 patients in IGOS, nerve conduction studies from 1137 (75.8%) were available for the current study. These patients were classified according to nerve conduction studies criteria proposed by Hadden and Rajabally.

Results: Of the 1137 studies, 68.3% (N = 777) were classified identically according to criteria by Hadden and Rajabally: 111 (9.8%) axonal, 366 (32.2%) demyelinating, 195 (17.2%) equivocal, 35 (3.1%) inexcitable and 70 (6.2%) normal. Thus, 360 studies (31.7%) were classified differently. The areas of differences were as follows: 155 studies (13.6%) classified as demyelinating by Hadden and axonal by Rajabally; 122 studies (10.7%) classified as demyelinating by Hadden and equivocal by Rajabally; and 75 studies (6.6%) classified as equivocal by Hadden and axonal by Rajabally. Due to more strictly defined cutoffs fewer patients fulfilled demyelinating criteria by Rajabally than by Hadden, making more patients eligible for axonal or equivocal classification by Rajabally. In 234 (68.6%) axonal studies by Rajabally the revised El Escorial (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) criteria were fulfilled; in axonal cases by Hadden this was 1.8%.

Conclusions And Discussion: This study shows that electrodiagnosis in GBS is dependent on the criterion set utilized, both of which are based on expert opinion. Reappraisal of electrodiagnostic subtyping in GBS is warranted.

Citing Articles

Clinical and electrophysiological features of pure sensory Guillain-Barré syndrome: retrospective analysis of 22 patients across 14 provinces in Southern China.

Liu S, Chu H, Peng B, Zeng Y, Liu J, Lu Z BMC Neurol. 2025; 25(1):87.

PMID: 40050755 PMC: 11883962. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-025-04103-w.


Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Leonhard S, Papri N, Querol L, Rinaldi S, Shahrizaila N, Jacobs B Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024; 10(1):97.

PMID: 39702645 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-024-00580-4.


Electrodiagnostic subtyping in Guillain-Barré syndrome patients in the International Guillain-Barré Outcome Study.

Arends S, Drenthen J, de Koning L, Van den Bergh P, Hadden R, Kuwabara S Eur J Neurol. 2024; 31(9):e16335.

PMID: 38965709 PMC: 11295174. DOI: 10.1111/ene.16335.

References
1.
Arends S, Drenthen J, de Koning L, Van den Bergh P, Hadden R, Kuwabara S . Electrodiagnostic subtyping in Guillain-Barré syndrome patients in the International Guillain-Barré Outcome Study. Eur J Neurol. 2024; 31(9):e16335. PMC: 11295174. DOI: 10.1111/ene.16335. View

2.
Rajabally Y, Durand M, Mitchell J, Orlikowski D, Nicolas G . Electrophysiological diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome subtype: could a single study suffice?. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014; 86(1):115-9. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-307815. View

3.
van Asseldonk J, van den Berg L, Kalmijn S, Wokke J, Franssen H . Criteria for demyelination based on the maximum slowing due to axonal degeneration, determined after warming in water at 37 degrees C: diagnostic yield in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Brain. 2005; 128(Pt 4):880-91. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh375. View

4.
Arends S, Drenthen J, Van den Bergh P, Franssen H, Hadden R, Islam B . Electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the International GBS Outcome Study: Differences in methods and reference values. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022; 138:231-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.014. View

5.
Uncini A, Ippoliti L, Shahrizaila N, Sekiguchi Y, Kuwabara S . Optimizing the electrodiagnostic accuracy in Guillain-Barré syndrome subtypes: Criteria sets and sparse linear discriminant analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017; 128(7):1176-1183. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.03.048. View