» Articles » PMID: 38961111

Metaproteomics-informed Stoichiometric Modeling Reveals the Responses of Wetland Microbial Communities to Oxygen and Sulfate Exposure

Abstract

Climate changes significantly impact greenhouse gas emissions from wetland soil. Specifically, wetland soil may be exposed to oxygen (O) during droughts, or to sulfate (SO) as a result of sea level rise. How these stressors - separately and together - impact microbial food webs driving carbon cycling in the wetlands is still not understood. To investigate this, we integrated geochemical analysis, proteogenomics, and stoichiometric modeling to characterize the impact of elevated SO and O levels on microbial methane (CH) and carbon dioxide (CO) emissions. The results uncovered the adaptive responses of this community to changes in SO and O availability and identified altered microbial guilds and metabolic processes driving CH and CO emissions. Elevated SO reduced CH emissions, with hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis more suppressed than acetoclastic. Elevated O shifted the greenhouse gas emissions from CH to CO. The metabolic effects of combined SO and O exposures on CH and CO emissions were similar to those of O exposure alone. The reduction in CH emission by increased SO and O was much greater than the concomitant increase in CO emission. Thus, greater SO and O exposure in wetlands is expected to reduce the aggregate warming effect of CH and CO. Metaproteomics and stoichiometric modeling revealed a unique subnetwork involving carbon metabolism that converts lactate and SO to produce acetate, HS, and CO when SO is elevated under oxic conditions. This study provides greater quantitative resolution of key metabolic processes necessary for the prediction of CH and CO emissions from wetlands under future climate scenarios.

Citing Articles

Sulfate and Dissolved Organic Carbon Concentrations Drive Distinct Microbial Community Patterns in Prairie Wetland Ponds.

Zahir Z, Khan F, Hall B Environ Microbiol Rep. 2025; 17(1):e70069.

PMID: 39871445 PMC: 11772329. DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.70069.

References
1.
Matzke M, Brown J, Gritsenko M, Metz T, Pounds J, Rodland K . A comparative analysis of computational approaches to relative protein quantification using peptide peak intensities in label-free LC-MS proteomics experiments. Proteomics. 2012; 13(3-4):493-503. PMC: 3775642. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200269. View

2.
Easterly C, Sajulga R, Mehta S, Johnson J, Kumar P, Hubler S . metaQuantome: An Integrated, Quantitative Metaproteomics Approach Reveals Connections Between Taxonomy and Protein Function in Complex Microbiomes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2019; 18(8 suppl 1):S82-S91. PMC: 6692774. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.RA118.001240. View

3.
Wilmoth J, Schaefer J, Schlesinger D, Roth S, Hatcher P, Shoemaker J . The role of oxygen in stimulating methane production in wetlands. Glob Chang Biol. 2021; 27(22):5831-5847. PMC: 9291790. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15831. View

4.
Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime J, Hector A . Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science. 2001; 294(5543):804-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1064088. View

5.
Xiao J, Tanca A, Jia B, Yang R, Wang B, Zhang Y . Metagenomic Taxonomy-Guided Database-Searching Strategy for Improving Metaproteomic Analysis. J Proteome Res. 2018; 17(4):1596-1605. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00894. View