» Articles » PMID: 38951305

A Sub-pharmacological Test Dose Does Not Predict Individual Docetaxel Exposure in Prostate Cancer Patients

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jul 1
PMID 38951305
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Docetaxel is a cytotoxic drug used for first-line treatment of various malignancies. It has a narrow therapeutic index and shows wide interpatient variability in clearance and toxicity. Tools for individual dose optimization are needed to maximize efficacy and avoid toxicity.

Methods: We performed a proof-of-concept study (EudraCT 2016-003785-77) to evaluate whether pharmacokinetics after a sub-pharmacological test dose of 1000 µg docetaxel (millidose) could be used to predict therapeutic dose exposure. Thirty prostate cancer patients eligible for treatment with docetaxel as part of routine clinical care were included. An intravenous docetaxel millidose was administered 1-7 days prior to therapeutic docetaxel. After both doses plasma docetaxel concentrations were measured by ultra- high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The docetaxel clearance was estimated with non-linear mixed effects modeling.

Results: Geometric mean docetaxel clearance was 57.9 L/h (GCV 78.6%) after admission of a millidose and 40.3 L/h (GCV 60.7%) after admission of a therapeutic dose. The millidose and therapeutic dose in a single patient were not significantly correlated (Spearman's rho R = 0.02, P = 0.92).

Conclusion: Docetaxel pharmacokinetics at milli- and therapeutic dose level showed insufficient correlation for individual dose optimization. However, the clearance of a docetaxel millidose and full dose are within the same order of magnitude. Therefore, docetaxel millidose pharmacokinetics could potentially facilitate prediction of docetaxel pharmacokinetics at a population level in situations where therapeutic dose levels are impractical, such as pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies or pediatric studies.

References
1.
Puisset F, Alexandre J, Treluyer J, Raoul V, Roche H, Goldwasser F . Clinical pharmacodynamic factors in docetaxel toxicity. Br J Cancer. 2007; 97(3):290-6. PMC: 2360335. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603872. View

2.
Fujita K, Yoshino E, Kawara K, Maeda K, Kusuhara H, Sugiyama Y . A clinical pharmacokinetic microdosing study of docetaxel with Japanese patients with cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015; 76(4):793-801. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-015-2844-2. View

3.
van der Heijden L, van Nuland M, Beijnen J, Huitema A, Dorlo T . A naïve pooled data approach for extrapolation of Phase 0 microdose trials to therapeutic dosing regimens. Clin Transl Sci. 2022; 16(2):258-268. PMC: 9926085. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13446. View

4.
Byon W, Smith M, Chan P, Tortorici M, Riley S, Dai H . Establishing best practices and guidance in population modeling: an experience with an internal population pharmacokinetic analysis guidance. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2013; 2:e51. PMC: 6483270. DOI: 10.1038/psp.2013.26. View

5.
Boosman R, de Rouw N, Huitema A, Burgers J, Ter Heine R . Prediction of the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed with a low test dose: A proof-of-concept study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 89(2):699-704. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15520. View