» Articles » PMID: 36419385

A Naïve Pooled Data Approach for Extrapolation of Phase 0 Microdose Trials to Therapeutic Dosing Regimens

Overview
Journal Clin Transl Sci
Date 2022 Nov 24
PMID 36419385
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microdosing is a strategy to obtain knowledge of human pharmacokinetics prior to Phase I clinical trials. The most frequently used method to extrapolate microdose (≤100 μg) pharmacokinetics to therapeutic doses is based on linear extrapolation from a noncompartmental analysis (NCA) with a two-fold acceptance criterion between pharmacokinetic metrics of the extrapolated microdose and the therapeutic dose. The major disadvantage of NCA is the assumption of linear extrapolation of NCA metrics. In this study, we used a naïve pooled data (NPD) modeling approach to extrapolate microdose pharmacokinetics to therapeutic pharmacokinetics. Gemcitabine and anastrozole were used as examples of intravenous and oral drugs, respectively. Data from microdose studies were used to build a parent-metabolite model for gemcitabine and its metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) and a model for anastrozole. The pharmacokinetic microdose models were extrapolated to therapeutic doses. Extrapolation of the microdose showed differences in pharmacokinetic shape for gemcitabine and dFdU between the simulated and observed therapeutic concentrations, whereas the observed therapeutic concentrations for anastrozole were captured by the extrapolation. This study demonstrated the possible use and feasibility of an NPD modeling approach for the evaluation and application of microdose studies in early drug development. Last, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling might be an alternative for microdose extrapolation of drugs with complex pharmacokinetics such as gemcitabine.

Citing Articles

Phase 0 trials/ Intra-Target-Microdosing (ITM) and the lung: a review.

Quinn T, Bruce A, Burt T, Dhaliwal K BMC Pulm Med. 2024; 24(1):425.

PMID: 39210357 PMC: 11363577. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03193-5.


A sub-pharmacological test dose does not predict individual docetaxel exposure in prostate cancer patients.

Heerma van Voss M, Notohardjo J, van Dodewaard-de Jong J, Bloemendal H, Ter Heine R Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2024; 94(3):437-441.

PMID: 38951305 PMC: 11420247. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-024-04684-2.


A naïve pooled data approach for extrapolation of Phase 0 microdose trials to therapeutic dosing regimens.

van der Heijden L, van Nuland M, Beijnen J, Huitema A, Dorlo T Clin Transl Sci. 2022; 16(2):258-268.

PMID: 36419385 PMC: 9926085. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13446.

References
1.
Rowland M . Microdosing: a critical assessment of human data. J Pharm Sci. 2012; 101(11):4067-74. DOI: 10.1002/jps.23290. View

2.
Lappin G, Garner R . Big physics, small doses: the use of AMS and PET in human microdosing of development drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003; 2(3):233-40. DOI: 10.1038/nrd1037. View

3.
Jiang X, Galettis P, Links M, Mitchell P, McLachlan A . Population pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its metabolite in patients with cancer: effect of oxaliplatin and infusion rate. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 65(3):326-33. PMC: 2291243. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03040.x. View

4.
Khatri A, Williams B, Fisher J, Brundage R, Gurvich V, Lis L . SLC28A3 genotype and gemcitabine rate of infusion affect dFdCTP metabolite disposition in patients with solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2013; 110(2):304-12. PMC: 3899768. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.738. View

5.
Nair A, Morsy M, Jacob S . Dose translation between laboratory animals and human in preclinical and clinical phases of drug development. Drug Dev Res. 2018; 79(8):373-382. DOI: 10.1002/ddr.21461. View