WHO, WHEN, HOW: a Scoping Review on Flexible At-home Respite for Informal Caregivers of Older Adults

Overview

Journal BMC Health Serv Res

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 Jun 26

PMID 38926712

Authors

Maude Viens

Alexandra Ethier

Veronique Provencher

Annie Carrier

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: As the world population is aging, considerable efforts need to be put towards developing and maintaining evidenced-based care for older adults. Respite services are part of the selection of homecare offered to informal caregivers. Although current best practices around respite are rooted in person centeredness, there is no integrated synthesis of its flexible components. Such a synthesis could offer a better understanding of key characteristics of flexible respite and, as such, support its implementation and use.

Methods: To map the literature around the characteristics of flexible at-home respite for informal caregivers of older adults, a scoping study was conducted. Qualitative data from the review was analyzed using content analysis. The characterization of flexible at-home respite was built on three dimensions: WHO, WHEN and HOW. To triangulate the scoping results, an online questionnaire was distributed to homecare providers and informal caregivers of older adults.

Results: A total of 42 documents were included in the review. The questionnaire was completed by 105 participants. The results summarize the characteristics of flexible at-home respite found in the literature. Flexibility in respite can be understood through three dimensions: (1) WHO is tendering it, (2) WHEN it is tendered and (3) HOW it is tendered. Firstly, human resources (WHO) must be compatible with the homecare sector as well as being trained and qualified to offer respite to informal caregivers of older adults. Secondly, flexible respite includes considerations of time, duration, frequency, and predictability (WHEN). Lastly, flexible at-home respite exhibits approachability, appropriateness, affordability, availability, and acceptability (HOW). Overall, flexible at-home respite adjusts to the needs of the informal caregiver and care recipient in terms of WHO, WHEN, and HOW.

Conclusion: This review is a step towards a more precise definition of flexible at-home respite. Flexibility of homecare, in particular respite, must be considered when designing, implementing and evaluating services.

Citing Articles

Navigating limited resources: experiences of caregivers for elderly terminal cancer patients in a region with limited palliative care services.

Yang Y, Liang X, Liu Q, Liu J Support Care Cancer. 2025; 33(3):207.

PMID: 39971822 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09270-7.

References

Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

Gelman C, Sokoloff T, Graziani N, Arias E, Peralta A . Individually-tailored support for ethnically-diverse caregivers: enhancing our understanding of what is needed and what works. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2014; 57(6-7):662-80. DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2014.881451. View

Strang V, Haughey M . Respite--a coping strategy for family caregivers. West J Nurs Res. 2001; 21(4):450-66; discussion 467-71. DOI: 10.1177/019394599902100403. View

Moore H, Dishman L, Fick J . The Challenge of Employee Retention in Medical Practices across the United States: An Exploratory Investigation Into the Relationship between Operational Succession Planning and Employee Turnover. Adv Health Care Manag. 2021; 20. DOI: 10.1108/S1474-823120210000020003. View

Washington T, Tachman J . Gerontological Social Work Student-Delivered Respite: A Community-University Partnership Pilot Program. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2016; 60(1):48-67. DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2016.1257530. View

Levac D, Colquhoun H, OBrien K . Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:69. PMC: 2954944. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. View

Dal Santo T, Scharlach A, Nielsen J, Fox P . A stress process model of family caregiver service utilization: factors associated with respite and counseling service use. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2007; 49(4):29-49. DOI: 10.1300/J083v49n04_03. View

Levesque J, Harris M, Russell G . Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013; 12:18. PMC: 3610159. DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18. View

Hesse E . PRO DEM: a community-based approach to care for dementia. Health Care Financ Rev. 2007; 27(1):89-94. PMC: 4194905. View

10.

OShea E, Timmons S, OShea E, Irving K . Multiple Stakeholders' Perspectives on Respite Service Access for People With Dementia and Their Carers. Gerontologist. 2019; 59(5):e490-e500. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz095. View

11.

Staicovici S . Respite care for all family caregivers: the LifeSpan Respite Care Act. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2004; 20(1):243-72. View

12.

Kristjanson L, Cousins K, White K, Andrews L, Lewin G, Tinnelly C . Evaluation of a night respite community palliative care service. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004; 10(2):84-90. DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2004.10.2.12453. View

13.

Mason A, Weatherly H, Spilsbury K, Arksey H, Golder S, Adamson J . A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different models of community-based respite care for frail older people and their carers. Health Technol Assess. 2007; 11(15):1-157, iii. DOI: 10.3310/hta11150. View

14.

Barrett M, Wheatland B, Haselby P, Larson A, Kristjanson L, Whyatt D . Palliative respite services using nursing staff reduces hospitalization of patients and improves acceptance among carers. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2009; 15(8):389-95. DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2009.15.8.43798. View

15.

Starns M, Karner T, Montgomery R . Exemplars of successful Alzheimer's demonstration projects. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2003; 21(3-4):141-75. DOI: 10.1300/J027v21n03_08. View

16.

Maayan N, Soares-Weiser K, Lee H . Respite care for people with dementia and their carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (1):CD004396. PMC: 11089513. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004396.pub3. View

17.

Derence K . Dementia-specific respite: the key to effective caregiver support. N C Med J. 2005; 66(1):48-51. View

18.

Vandepitte S, Putman K, Van Den Noortgate N, Verhaeghe S, Annemans L . Effectiveness of an in-home respite care program to support informal dementia caregivers: A comparative study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019; 34(10):1534-1544. DOI: 10.1002/gps.5164. View

19.

Whitlatch C, Friss Feinberg L . Family and friends as respite providers. J Aging Soc Policy. 2006; 18(3-4):127-39. DOI: 10.1300/J031v18n03_09. View

20.

Marquant M . [A volunteer helper for carers of patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease]. Soins Gerontol. 2010; (85):36-7. View