» Articles » PMID: 38897943

Improving Glycemic Control by Transitioning from the MiniMed 640G to 770G in Japanese Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: a Prospective, Single-center, Observational Study

Overview
Journal Endocr J
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38897943
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effectiveness of a hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system in improving glycemic control is unclear in Japanese individuals. Therefore, we assessed the effect impact of the MiniMed 770G HCL system on glycemic control in this population. This prospective, single-center, 24-week observational study (registration number: UMIN000047394) enrolled 23 individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus using the Medtronic MiniMed 640G system. The primary endpoint was the improvement in time in the range of 70-180 mg/dL after transitioning to the MiniMed 770G HCL system. We observed an increase in time in range (from 64.1 [55.8-69.5] to 70.9 [67.1-74.4] %, interquartile range 25-75%, p < 0.001) and a decrease in glycated hemoglobin level (from 7.4 [7.0-7.9] to 7.1 [6.8-7.4] %, p = 0.003). There was a significant reduction in time above the range (181-250 mg/dL: 25.8 [20.9-28.6] to 19.5 [17.1-22.1] %, p < 0.001; >251 mg/dL: 8.7 [4.0-13.0] to 4.7 [3.6-9.1] %, p < 0.001). Time below the range remained unchanged (54-69 mg/dL: 1.8 [0.4-2.4] to 2.1 [0.4-3.9] %, p = 0.24; <54 mg/dL: 0.2 [0.0-1.0] to 0.5 [0.1-1.3] %, p = 0.14). In a subgroup of 12 patients with a high HCL implementation rate, the basal insulin infusion decreased immediately after mealtime insulin administration and increased after approximately 120 minutes. The ratings from questionnaires assessing treatment burden, satisfaction, and quality of life remained unchanged. The MiniMed 770G HCL system improved glycemic control and optimized insulin delivery, particularly in patients with high implementation rates.

Citing Articles

Effects of switching from MiniMed™ 640G to 770G on continuous glucose monitoring metrics and DTR-QOL scores: An observational study of Japanese people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Kogai T, Sato J, Yasuda H, Ayame T, Ozaki A, Takagi E J Diabetes Investig. 2024; 16(2):326-333.

PMID: 39513544 PMC: 11786187. DOI: 10.1111/jdi.14350.

References
1.
Tsunemi A, Sato J, Kurita M, Wakabayashi Y, Waseda N, Koshibu M . Effect of real-life insulin pump with predictive low-glucose management use for 3 months: Analysis of the patients treated in a Japanese center. J Diabetes Investig. 2020; 11(6):1564-1569. PMC: 7610121. DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13288. View

2.
Polonsky W, Anderson B, Lohrer P, Welch G, Jacobson A, Aponte J . Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18(6):754-60. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.18.6.754. View

3.
McAuley S, Lee M, Paldus B, Vogrin S, de Bock M, Abraham M . Six Months of Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Manual Insulin Delivery With Fingerprick Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43(12):3024-3033. DOI: 10.2337/dc20-1447. View

4.
Collyns O, Meier R, Betts Z, Chan D, Frampton C, Frewen C . Improved Glycemic Outcomes With Medtronic MiniMed Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Delivery: Results From a Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing Automated Insulin Delivery With Predictive Low Glucose Suspend in People With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44(4):969-975. DOI: 10.2337/dc20-2250. View

5.
Phillip M, Nimri R, Bergenstal R, Barnard-Kelly K, Danne T, Hovorka R . Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice. Endocr Rev. 2022; 44(2):254-280. PMC: 9985411. DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnac022. View