» Articles » PMID: 37782904

Real-World Use of Control-IQ Technology Is Associated with a Lower Rate of Severe Hypoglycemia and Diabetic Ketoacidosis Than Historical Data: Results of the Control-IQ Observational (CLIO) Prospective Study

Overview
Date 2023 Oct 2
PMID 37782904
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Severe hypoglycemia (SH) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) remain significant risks with intensive insulin therapy. While these adverse event (AE) rates are generally very low in advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) clinical studies, prospectively collected real-world AE rates are lacking. The Control-IQ Observational (CLIO) study was a single-arm, prospective, longitudinal, postmarket surveillance study of individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) age 6 years and older who began the use of t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology in the real-world outpatient setting. AEs were reported monthly over 12 months and were compared to historical data from the T1D Exchange. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed quarterly. All study visits were virtual. Three thousand one hundred fifty-seven participants enrolled from August 2020 through March 2022. Two thousand nine hundred ninety-eight participants completed through 12 months. SH rates were significantly lower than historic rates for children (9.31 vs. 19.31 events/100 patient years,  = 0.29,  < 0.01) and adults (9.77 vs. 29.49 events/100 patient years,  = 0.53,  < 0.01). DKA rates were also significantly lower in both groups. Lower observed rates of AEs occurred independent of baseline hemoglobin A1c or prior insulin delivery method. Time in range 70-180 mg/dL was 70.1% (61.0-78.8) for adults, 61.2% (52.4-70.5) for age 6-13, 60.9% (50.1-71.8) for age 14-17, and 67.3% (57.4-76.9) overall. Reduction in diabetes burden was consistently reported. SH and DKA rates were lower for users of t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology compared to historical data for both adults and children. Real-world use of this AHCL system proved safe and effective in this virtual study design. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04503174).

Citing Articles

One-year real-world benefits of Tandem Control-IQ technology on glucose management and person-reported outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: a prospective observational cohort study.

De Meulemeester J, Keymeulen B, De Block C, Van Huffel L, Taes Y, Ballaux D Diabetologia. 2025; .

PMID: 39934368 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-025-06366-x.


Severe Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Ongoing Challenges in Care.

Foti Randazzese S, La Rocca M, Bombaci B, Di Pisa A, Giliberto E, Inturri T Children (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39857941 PMC: 11763767. DOI: 10.3390/children12010110.


Twelve-Month Real-World Use of an Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System Versus Previous Therapy in a Dutch Center For Specialized Type 1 Diabetes Care.

Dekker P, Van den Heuvel T, Arrieta A, Castaneda J, Mul D, Veeze H J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; :19322968241290259.

PMID: 39465557 PMC: 11571609. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241290259.


Effect of automated insulin delivery systems on person-reported outcomes in people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Roos T, Hermanns N, Gross C, Kulzer B, Haak T, Ehrmann D EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 76:102852.

PMID: 39364272 PMC: 11447321. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102852.


Safety and Psychological Outcomes of Tandem t:Slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ Technology in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

Mameli C, Smylie G, Marigliano M, Zagaroli L, Mancioppi V, Maffeis C Diabetes Ther. 2024; 15(10):2133-2149.

PMID: 39008237 PMC: 11411026. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-024-01618-2.


References
1.
Gubitosi-Klug R, Braffett B, White N, Sherwin R, Service F, Lachin J . Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes Over 30 Years of Follow-up in the DCCT/EDIC Study. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(8):1010-1016. PMC: 5521975. DOI: 10.2337/dc16-2723. View

2.
. Adverse events and their association with treatment regimens in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18(11):1415-27. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.18.11.1415. View

3.
Breton M, Kanapka L, Beck R, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza G, Cengiz E . A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(9):836-845. PMC: 7920146. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004736. View

4.
Pinsker J, Muller L, Constantin A, Leas S, Manning M, McElwee Malloy M . Real-World Patient-Reported Outcomes and Glycemic Results with Initiation of Control-IQ Technology. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020; 23(2):120-127. PMC: 7868573. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0388. View

5.
Renard E, Tubiana-Rufi N, Bonnemaison E, Coutant R, Dalla-Vale F, Bismuth E . Outcomes of hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery activated 24/7 versus evening and night in free-living prepubertal children with type 1 diabetes: A multicentre, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 24(3):511-521. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14605. View