» Articles » PMID: 38895731

Probiotic Bacteria Can Modulate Immune Responses to Paratuberculosis Vaccination

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

subsp. (Map) is the etiological agent of paratuberculosis (PTB), a chronic intestinal inflammatory disease that causes high economical losses in dairy livestock worldwide. Due to the absence of widely available preventive or therapeutical treatments, new alternative therapies are needed. In this study, the effect of a probiotic alone or in combination with a commercial vaccine has been evaluated in a rabbit model. Vaccination enhanced the humoral response, exerted a training effect of peripheral polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) against homologous and heterologous stimuli, stimulated the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) macrophages, and reduced the bacterial burden in GALT as well. However, the administration of the probiotic after vaccination did not affect the PMN activity, increased metabolic demand, and supressed pro-inflammatory cytokines, although humoral response and bacterial burden decrease in GALT was maintained similar to vaccination alone. The administration of the probiotic alone did not enhance the humoral response or PMN activity, and the bacterial burden in GALT was further increased compared to the only challenged group. In conclusion, the probiotic was able to modulate the immune response hampering the clearance of the infection and was also able to affect the response of innate immune cells after vaccination. This study shows that the administration of a probiotic can modulate the immune response pathways triggered by vaccination and/or infection and even exacerbate the outcome of the disease, bringing forward the importance of verifying treatment combinations in the context of each particular infectious agent.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of alternative vaccination routes against paratuberculosis in goats.

Criado M, Silva M, Arteche-Villasol N, Zapico D, Elguezabal N, Molina E Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1457849.

PMID: 39664904 PMC: 11631874. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1457849.

References
1.
Jolly A, Fernandez B, Stempler A, Ingratta G, Postma G, Boviez J . Antibodies from healthy or paratuberculosis infected cows have different effects on Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis invasion in a calf ileal loop model. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2022; 245:110381. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2022.110381. View

2.
Click R, Van Kampen C . Assessment of Dietzia subsp. C79793-74 for treatment of cattle with evidence of paratuberculosis. Virulence. 2010; 1(3):145-55. PMC: 3073243. DOI: 10.4161/viru.1.3.10897. View

3.
Kazemifard N, Dehkohneh A, Ghavami S . Probiotics and probiotic-based vaccines: A novel approach for improving vaccine efficacy. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:940454. PMC: 9606607. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.940454. View

4.
Badiei A, Moosakhani F, Hamidi A, Sami M . The effect of Protexin on prevention of ileocecal infection by Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2013; 96(10):6535-8. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5535. View

5.
Li R, Jia Z, Trush M . Defining ROS in Biology and Medicine. React Oxyg Species (Apex). 2018; 1(1):9-21. PMC: 5921829. DOI: 10.20455/ros.2016.803. View