» Articles » PMID: 38895366

A Denoising Convolutional Autoencoder for SNR Enhancement in Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging: (DCAE-CEST)

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38895366
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop a SNR enhancement method for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging using a denoising convolutional autoencoder (DCAE), and compare its performance with state-of-the-art denoising methods.

Method: The DCAE-CEST model encompasses an encoder and a decoder network. The encoder learns features from the input CEST Z-spectrum via a series of 1D convolutions, nonlinearity applications and pooling. Subsequently, the decoder reconstructs an output denoised Z-spectrum using a series of up-sampling and convolution layers. The DCAE-CEST model underwent multistage training in an environment constrained by Kullback-Leibler divergence, while ensuring data adaptability through context learning using Principal Component Analysis processed Z-spectrum as a reference. The model was trained using simulated Z-spectra, and its performance was evaluated using both simulated data and in-vivo data from an animal tumor model. Maps of amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) effects were quantified using the multiple-pool Lorentzian fit, along with an apparent exchange-dependent relaxation metric.

Results: In digital phantom experiments, the DCAE-CEST method exhibited superior performance, surpassing existing denoising techniques, as indicated by the peak SNR and Structural Similarity Index. Additionally, in vivo data further confirms the effectiveness of the DCAE-CEST in denoising the APT and NOE maps when compared to other methods. While no significant difference was observed in APT between tumors and normal tissues, there was a significant difference in NOE, consistent with previous findings.

Conclusion: The DCAE-CEST can learn the most important features of the CEST Z-spectrum and provide the most effective denoising solution compared to other methods.

References
1.
Zaiss M, Zu Z, Xu J, Schuenke P, Gochberg D, Gore J . A combined analytical solution for chemical exchange saturation transfer and semi-solid magnetization transfer. NMR Biomed. 2014; 28(2):217-30. PMC: 4297271. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3237. View

2.
Zhou J, Tryggestad E, Wen Z, Lal B, Zhou T, Grossman R . Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides. Nat Med. 2010; 17(1):130-4. PMC: 3058561. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2268. View

3.
Jiang S, Eberhart C, Lim M, Heo H, Zhang Y, Blair L . Identifying Recurrent Malignant Glioma after Treatment Using Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MR Imaging: A Validation Study with Image-Guided Stereotactic Biopsy. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 25(2):552-561. PMC: 6335169. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1233. View

4.
Breitling J, Deshmane A, Goerke S, Korzowski A, Herz K, Ladd M . Adaptive denoising for chemical exchange saturation transfer MR imaging. NMR Biomed. 2019; 32(11):e4133. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4133. View

5.
Zhang X, Wang F, Li H, Xu J, Gochberg D, Gore J . Accuracy in the quantification of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer effects. NMR Biomed. 2017; 30(7). PMC: 5490367. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3716. View