» Articles » PMID: 38890856

Is Sustainable Consumption a Sufficient Motivator for Consumers to Adopt Meat Alternatives? A Consumer Perspective on Plant-Based, Cell-Culture-Derived, and Insect-Based Alternatives

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Jun 19
PMID 38890856
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigates consumer preference and acceptance of three meat alternatives-plant-based, lab-grown, and insect-based-as sustainable choices to meet the demands of a growing population and evolving food systems. Insights were gathered from European consumers regarding their perceptions and consumption patterns using a mixed-methods approach. The approach employed a questionnaire followed by focus group discussions conducted in Slovenia and the UK to understand the motivations and barriers behind their responses. The UK and Slovenia were chosen as they provided the highest response rates to the questionnaire and they have differing legislation. The results show that plant-based alternatives are the most familiar and accepted option, while lab-grown meat and insect-based products are less familiar and have lower acceptance rates. Moreover, they show that although sustainability factors are important to consumers, they are not their only concern; health and nutrition are the primary motivators for choosing meat alternatives. These are followed closely by sensory appeal, pricing, and a preference for natural, minimally processed options. Based on insights from the focus groups, strategies to overcome the barriers to the acceptance of meat alternatives should include targeted product categorisation and placement, educational campaigns, effective use of media, and greater transparency in product information.

Citing Articles

From Farms to Labs: The New Trend of Sustainable Meat Alternatives.

Samad A, Kim S, Kim C, Lee E, Kumari S, Hossain M Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025; 45(1):13-30.

PMID: 39840251 PMC: 11743840. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e105.


Consumer Perceptions and Acceptance of Edible Insects in Slovenia.

Rehman N, Ogrinc N Foods. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200556 PMC: 11353506. DOI: 10.3390/foods13162629.

References
1.
Aiking H . Protein production: planet, profit, plus people?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014; 100 Suppl 1:483S-9S. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071209. View

2.
Henchion M, Hayes M, Mullen A, Fenelon M, Tiwari B . Future Protein Supply and Demand: Strategies and Factors Influencing a Sustainable Equilibrium. Foods. 2017; 6(7). PMC: 5532560. DOI: 10.3390/foods6070053. View

3.
Bryant C . Culture, meat, and cultured meat. J Anim Sci. 2020; 98(8). PMC: 7398566. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa172. View

4.
Rodriguez Escobar M, Cadena E, Nhu T, Cooreman-Algoed M, De Smet S, Dewulf J . Analysis of the Cultured Meat Production System in Function of Its Environmental Footprint: Current Status, Gaps and Recommendations. Foods. 2021; 10(12). PMC: 8701123. DOI: 10.3390/foods10122941. View

5.
Aschemann-Witzel J, Gantriis R, Fraga P, Perez-Cueto F . Plant-based food and protein trend from a business perspective: markets, consumers, and the challenges and opportunities in the future. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020; 61(18):3119-3128. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1793730. View