» Articles » PMID: 38886707

The Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning and Case-based Learning Teaching Methods in Clinical Practical Teaching in TACE Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 Jun 17
PMID 38886707
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching methods in clinical practical teaching in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment in China.

Materials And Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, the Weipu database and the Wanfang database up to June 2023 was performed to collect studies that evaluate the effectiveness of problem-based learning and case-based learning teaching methods in clinical practical teaching in TACE treatment in China. Statistical analysis was performed by R software (4.2.1) calling JAGS software (4.3.1) in a Bayesian framework using the Markov chain-Monte Carlo method for direct and indirect comparisons. The R packages "gemtc", "rjags", "openxlsx", and "ggplot2" were used for statistical analysis and data output.

Results: Finally, 7 studies (five RCTs and two observational studies) were included in the meta-analysis. The combination of PBL and CBL showed more effectiveness in clinical thinking capacity, clinical practice capacity, knowledge understanding degree, literature reading ability, method satisfaction degree, learning efficiency, learning interest, practical skills examination scores and theoretical knowledge examination scores.

Conclusions: Network meta-analysis revealed that the application of PBL combined with the CBL teaching mode in the teaching of liver cancer intervention therapy significantly improves the teaching effect and significantly improves the theoretical and surgical operations, meeting the requirements of clinical education.

References
1.
Torbahn G, Hofmann H, Rucker G, Bischoff K, Freitag M, Dersch R . Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotic Therapy in Early Cutaneous Lyme Borreliosis: A Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2018; 154(11):1292-1303. PMC: 6248135. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3186. View

2.
Weir C, Taylor R . Informed decision-making: Statistical methodology for surrogacy evaluation and its role in licensing and reimbursement assessments. Pharm Stat. 2022; 21(4):740-756. PMC: 9546435. DOI: 10.1002/pst.2219. View

3.
Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell D, Chaimani A, Schmid C, Cameron C . The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(11):777-84. DOI: 10.7326/M14-2385. View

4.
Zuo M, Huang J . The history of interventional therapy for liver cancer in China. J Interv Med. 2021; 1(2):70-76. PMC: 8586572. DOI: 10.19779/j.cnki.2096-3602.2018.02.02. View

5.
Chen L, Martinelli E, Cheng A, Pentheroudakis G, Qin S, Bhattacharyya G . Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with intermediate and advanced/relapsed hepatocellular carcinoma: a TOS-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, ISMPO, JSMO, KSMO, MOS and SSO. Ann Oncol. 2020; 31(3):334-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.12.001. View