» Articles » PMID: 38874280

Single-cell Transcriptomics Reveals Antigen-presenting Capacity and Therapeutic Resistance Potential of Immunomodulatory Endothelial Cells in Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The heterogeneity of tumor endothelial cells (TECs) hinders the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapies (AATs). Only a small percentage of angiogenic TECs are considered effective targets for AATs. Immunomodulatory ECs (IMECs), as a newly focused functional subgroup of endothelial cells (ECs), are being evaluated for their ability to regulate tumor immune balance and influence existing AATs.

Methods: Based on single-cell transcriptome data from colorectal cancer in a publicly available database, we conducted a wide array of bioinformatic approaches to study EC subsets that meet the IMECs definition. Our investigation encompassed the gene expression signatures of these subsets, cellular composition differences, cell-cell interactions.

Results: Two subsets that meet the IMECs definition were found in tumors and para-cancerous tissues. Combined with the results of gene ontological analysis and interaction with CD4 T cells, we found that IMECs can present MHC-II antigens to mature CD4 T cells. There were differences in the level of interaction between IMECs and different types of mature CD4 T cell subsets. In addition, IMEC subsets had different expression levels of angiogenesis related genes. The angiogenesis score of IMECs decreased after patients received immunotherapy. IMEC subsets do not depend on a single proangiogenic receptor and are involved in regulating angiogenesis, which may reduce the efficacy of AATs. The adverse effects of specific IMEC subsets on AATs were validated in the RNA-seq dataset of the bevacizumab treatment group.

Conclusion: Our study suggests the potential MHC-II antigen presentation capacity of IMECs and the enhanced angiogenesis characteristics within tumors. The function of IMECs in the vascular network may have a potentially adverse effect on AATs. Controlling the functional properties of IMECs may be a new angle for tumor therapy.

References
1.
Huang D, Sherman B, Lempicki R . Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4(1):44-57. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. View

2.
Saio S, Konishi K, Hohjoh H, Tamura Y, Masutani T, Iddamalgoda A . Extracellular Environment-Controlled Angiogenesis, and Potential Application for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(20). PMC: 8541280. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011169. View

3.
Denisenko E, Guo B, Jones M, Hou R, de Kock L, Lassmann T . Systematic assessment of tissue dissociation and storage biases in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows. Genome Biol. 2020; 21(1):130. PMC: 7265231. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-02048-6. View

4.
de Heer E, Jalving M, Harris A . HIFs, angiogenesis, and metabolism: elusive enemies in breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 2020; 130(10):5074-5087. PMC: 7524491. DOI: 10.1172/JCI137552. View

5.
Zhang Y, Chen H, Mo H, Hu X, Gao R, Zhao Y . Single-cell analyses reveal key immune cell subsets associated with response to PD-L1 blockade in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2021; 39(12):1578-1593.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.09.010. View