» Articles » PMID: 38870101

Morphological and Dimensional Analysis of the Nasopalatine Canal: Insights from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging in a Large Cohort

Abstract

BACKGROUND The nasopalatine canal (NPC), or incisive canal, is located in the midline of the palate, posterior to the maxillary central incisors. Its anatomy is important in prosthetic dentistry procedures. This study aimed to assess the anatomical morphology of the NPC according to age, sex, and dental status using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in 335 patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective cross-sectional study, a total of 335 patients were recruited and categorized according to sex, age, and dental status. Individual CBCT images were analyzed in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes. Also, we recorded the dimensions and morphological shape of the NPC and adjacent buccal bone plate (BBP) under standardized conditions. The associations between sex, age group, NPC shapes and types, and presence of central incisors were assessed. A significance level was set at P<0.05. RESULTS Mean labio-palatal and mediolateral measurements of the incisive foramen were 5.13±1.45 mm and 3.21±0.96 mm, whereas the mean diameter of Stenson foramen was 2.57±1.25 mm, and the total length of the NPC was 11.79±2.50 mm. Funnel, Y, and round-shaped canals were the most prevalent shapes of the NPC in sagittal, coronal, and axial planes. BBP was greater in men, with P=0.011, P=0.000, and P=0.001 at BBP1, BBP2, and BBP3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS NPC and BBP parameter values were slightly higher among male patients. NPC parameters increased with older age. The crest width of BBP decreased with older age and after missing maxillary central incisor teeth.

Citing Articles

Sex and Population Variations in Nasopalatine Canal Dimensions: A CBCT-Based Systematic Review.

Alhumaidi A, Okshah A, Al Moaleem M, Alsabi M, Muharraq I, Asiri A Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30:e945949.

PMID: 39410677 PMC: 11493316. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945949.

References
1.
Porto O, de Freitas Silva B, Silva J, Estrela C, Alencar A, Bueno M . CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020; 28:e20190148. PMC: 6999116. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0148. View

2.
Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, Hu Y, Adriaensens P, Quirynen M . Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36(7):598-603. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01429.x. View

3.
Cordova-Limaylla N, Rosas-Diaz J, Alvarez-Medina R, Palomino-Zorrilla J, Guerrero-Acevedo M, Cervantes-Ganoza L . Evaluation of Buccal Bone Wall Thickness of Anterosuperior Teeth and Nasopalatine Duct Morphology in Cone Beam Computed Tomography of Patients Living at Different Altitudes: A Two-Year Retrospective Study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022; 11(6):652-660. PMC: 8713499. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_126_21. View

4.
Ozeren Keskek C, Aytugar E, Cene E . Retrospective Assessment of the Anatomy and Dimensions of Nasopalatine Canal with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2022; 13(2):e4. PMC: 9358607. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2022.13204. View

5.
Kuc A, Kotula J, Nawrocki J, Babczynska A, Lis J, Kawala B . The Assessment of the Rank of Torque Control during Incisor Retraction and Its Impact on the Resorption of Maxillary Central Incisor Roots According to Incisive Canal Anatomy-Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(8). PMC: 10144814. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082774. View