» Articles » PMID: 38851888

AbMelt: Learning Antibody Thermostability from Molecular Dynamics

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2024 Jun 9
PMID 38851888
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antibody thermostability is challenging to predict from sequence and/or structure. This difficulty is likely due to the absence of direct entropic information. Herein, we present AbMelt where we model the inherent flexibility of homologous antibody structures using molecular dynamics simulations at three temperatures and learn the relevant descriptors to predict the temperatures of aggregation (T), melt onset (T), and melt (T). We observed that the radius of gyration deviation of the complementarity determining regions at 400 K is the highest Pearson correlated descriptor with aggregation temperature (r = -0.68 ± 0.23) and the deviation of internal molecular contacts at 350 K is the highest correlated descriptor with both T (r = -0.74 ± 0.04) as well as T (r = -0.69 ± 0.03). Moreover, after descriptor selection and machine learning regression, we predict on a held-out test set containing both internal and public data and achieve robust performance for all endpoints compared with baseline models (T R = 0.57 ± 0.11, T R = 0.56 ± 0.01, and T R = 0.60 ± 0.06). In addition, the robustness of the AbMelt molecular dynamics methodology is demonstrated by only training on <5% of the data and outperforming more traditional machine learning models trained on the entire data set of more than 500 internal antibodies. Users can predict thermostability measurements for antibody variable fragments by collecting descriptors and using AbMelt, which has been made available.

Citing Articles

Prediction of protein biophysical traits from limited data: a case study on nanobody thermostability through NanoMelt.

Ramon A, Ni M, Predeina O, Gaffey R, Kunz P, Onuoha S MAbs. 2025; 17(1):2442750.

PMID: 39772905 PMC: 11730357. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2024.2442750.


The Application of Machine Learning on Antibody Discovery and Optimization.

Zheng J, Wang Y, Liang Q, Cui L, Wang L Molecules. 2025; 29(24.

PMID: 39770013 PMC: 11679646. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29245923.


Machine learning tools advance biophysics.

Schlick T, Wei G Biophys J. 2024; 123(17):E1-E3.

PMID: 39173628 PMC: 11393673. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.07.036.

References
1.
Salgado J, Rapaport I, Asenjo J . Predicting the behaviour of proteins in hydrophobic interaction chromatography. 2. Using a statistical description of their surface amino acid distribution. J Chromatogr A. 2005; 1107(1-2):120-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.12.033. View

2.
Korendovych I . Rational and Semirational Protein Design. Methods Mol Biol. 2017; 1685:15-23. PMC: 5912912. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7366-8_2. View

3.
McGibbon R, Beauchamp K, Harrigan M, Klein C, Swails J, Hernandez C . MDTraj: A Modern Open Library for the Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories. Biophys J. 2015; 109(8):1528-32. PMC: 4623899. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015. View

4.
Yang K, Wu Z, Arnold F . Machine-learning-guided directed evolution for protein engineering. Nat Methods. 2019; 16(8):687-694. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0496-6. View

5.
Strobl C, Boulesteix A, Zeileis A, Hothorn T . Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8:25. PMC: 1796903. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-25. View