» Articles » PMID: 38845069

Nonclinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment for Knobs-into-holes Bispecific IgG Antibodies

Overview
Journal MAbs
Date 2024 Jun 6
PMID 38845069
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bispecific antibodies, including bispecific IgG, are emerging as an important new class of antibody therapeutics. As a result, we, as well as others, have developed engineering strategies designed to facilitate the efficient production of bispecific IgG for clinical development. For example, we have extensively used knobs-into-holes (KIH) mutations to facilitate the heterodimerization of antibody heavy chains and more recently Fab mutations to promote cognate heavy/light chain pairing for efficient assembly of bispecific IgG in single host cells. A panel of related monospecific and bispecific IgG antibodies was constructed and assessed for immunogenicity risk by comparison with benchmark antibodies with known low (Avastin and Herceptin) or high (bococizumab and ATR-107) clinical incidence of anti-drug antibodies. Assay methods used include dendritic cell internalization, T cell proliferation, and T cell epitope identification by prediction and MHC-associated peptide proteomics. Data from each method were considered independently and then together for an overall integrated immunogenicity risk assessment. , these data suggest that the KIH mutations and assembly of half antibodies do not represent a major risk for immunogenicity of bispecific IgG, nor do the Fab mutations used for efficient assembly of bispecifics in single host cells. Comparable or slightly higher immunogenicity risk assessment data were obtained for research-grade preparations of trastuzumab and bevacizumab versus Herceptin and Avastin, respectively. These data provide experimental support for the common practice of using research-grade preparations of IgG as surrogates for immunogenicity risk assessment of their corresponding pharmaceutical counterparts.

Citing Articles

A single point mutation on FLT3L-Fc protein increases the risk of immunogenicity.

Qin D, Phung Q, Wu P, Yin Z, Tam S, Tran P Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1519452.

PMID: 40018031 PMC: 11865242. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1519452.


Evaluating the Immunogenicity Risk of Protein Therapeutics by Augmenting T Cell Epitope Prediction with Clinical Factors.

Hu Z, Wu P, Swanson S AAPS J. 2025; 27(1):33.

PMID: 39849284 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-024-01003-8.


Immunogenicity risk assessment and mitigation for engineered antibody and protein therapeutics.

Carter P, Quarmby V Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2024; 23(12):898-913.

PMID: 39424922 DOI: 10.1038/s41573-024-01051-x.

References
1.
Gokemeijer J, Wen Y, Jawa V, Mitra-Kaushik S, Chung S, Goggins A . Survey Outcome on Immunogenicity Risk Assessment Tools for Biotherapeutics: an Insight into Consensus on Methods, Application, and Utility in Drug Development. AAPS J. 2023; 25(4):55. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-023-00820-7. View

2.
Swaminathan A, Lucas R, Dear K, McMichael A . Keyhole limpet haemocyanin - a model antigen for human immunotoxicological studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 78(5):1135-42. PMC: 4243888. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12422. View

3.
Olsen T, Boyles F, Deane C . Observed Antibody Space: A diverse database of cleaned, annotated, and translated unpaired and paired antibody sequences. Protein Sci. 2021; 31(1):141-146. PMC: 8740823. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4205. View

4.
Jackisch C, Kim S, Semiglazov V, Melichar B, Pivot X, Hillenbach C . Subcutaneous versus intravenous formulation of trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer: updated results from the phase III HannaH study. Ann Oncol. 2014; 26(2):320-5. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu524. View

5.
Schmitt C, Emrich T, Chebon S, Fernandez E, Petry C, Yoneyama K . Low immunogenicity of emicizumab in persons with haemophilia A. Haemophilia. 2021; 27(6):984-992. PMC: 9292930. DOI: 10.1111/hae.14398. View