» Articles » PMID: 39424922

Immunogenicity Risk Assessment and Mitigation for Engineered Antibody and Protein Therapeutics

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2024 Oct 18
PMID 39424922
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Remarkable progress has been made in recent decades in engineering antibodies and other protein therapeutics, including enhancements to existing functions as well as the advent of novel molecules that confer biological activities previously unknown in nature. These protein therapeutics have brought major benefits to patients across multiple areas of medicine. One major ongoing challenge is that protein therapeutics can elicit unwanted immune responses (immunogenicity) in treated patients, including the generation of anti-drug antibodies. In rare and unpredictable cases, anti-drug antibodies can seriously compromise therapeutic safety and/or efficacy. Systematic deconvolution of this immunogenicity problem is confounded by the complexity of its many contributing factors and the inherent limitations of available experimental and computational methods. Nevertheless, continued progress with the assessment and mitigation of immunogenicity risk at the preclinical stage has the potential to reduce the incidence and severity of clinical immunogenicity events. This Review focuses on identifying key unsolved anti-drug antibody-related challenges and offers some pragmatic approaches towards addressing them. Examples are drawn mainly from antibodies, given that the majority of available clinical data are from this class of protein therapeutics. Plausible and seemingly tractable solutions are in sight for some immunogenicity problems, whereas other challenges will likely require completely new approaches.

Citing Articles

Establishing endotoxin limits to enhance the reliability of in vitro immunogenicity risk assessments.

Jeong Y, Lennon G, Veldman G, Serna D, Ibrahimov A MAbs. 2025; 17(1):2458627.

PMID: 39893505 PMC: 11792839. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2025.2458627.

References
1.
Walsh G, Walsh E . Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2022. Nat Biotechnol. 2022; 40(12):1722-1760. PMC: 9735008. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-022-01582-x. View

2.
Fulop T, Meszaros T, Kozma G, Szebeni J, Jozsi M . Infusion Reactions Associated with the Medical Application of Monoclonal Antibodies: The Role of Complement Activation and Possibility of Inhibition by Factor H. Antibodies (Basel). 2019; 7(1). PMC: 6698840. DOI: 10.3390/antib7010014. View

3.
Rombouts M, Swart E, van den Eertwegh A, Crul M . Systematic Review on Infusion Reactions to and Infusion Rate of Monoclonal Antibodies Used in Cancer Treatment. Anticancer Res. 2020; 40(3):1201-1218. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14062. View

4.
Sala-Cunill A, Luengo O, Cardona V . Biologics and anaphylaxis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019; 19(5):439-446. DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000550. View

5.
Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A, Godel P, Subklewe M, Stemmler H, Schlosser H, Schlaak M . Cytokine release syndrome. J Immunother Cancer. 2018; 6(1):56. PMC: 6003181. DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0343-9. View