» Articles » PMID: 38828075

Effect of Detector Orientation and Influence of Jaw Position in the Determination of Small-field Output Factor with Various Detectors for High-energy Photon Beams

Overview
Journal J Med Phys
Date 2024 Jun 3
PMID 38828075
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate dose measurements are difficult in small fields due to charge particle disequilibrium, partial source occlusion, steep dose gradient, and the finite size of the detector.

Aim: The study aims to determine the output factor using various detectors oriented in parallel and perpendicular orientations for three different tertiary collimating systems using 15 MV photon beams. In addition, this study analyzes how the output factor could be affected by different configurations of X and Y jaws above the tertiary collimators.

Materials And Methods: Small field output factor measurements were carried out with three detectors for different tertiary collimating systems such as BrainLab stereotactic cones, BrainLab mMLC and Millennium MLC namely. To analyze the effect of jaw position on output factor, measurements have been carried out by positioning the jaws at the edge, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 cm away from the tertiary collimated field.

Results: The data acquired with 15 MV photon beams show significant differences in output factor obtained with different detectors for all collimating systems. For smaller fields when compared to microDiamond, the SRS diode underestimates the output by up to -1.7% ± 0.8% and -2.1% ± 0.3%, and the pinpoint ion chamber underestimates the output by up to -8.1% ± 1.4% and -11.9% ± 1.9% in their parallel and perpendicular orientation respectively. A large increase in output factor was observed in the small field when the jaw was moved 0.25 cm symmetrically away from the tertiary collimated field.

Conclusion: The investigated data on the effect of jaw position inferred that the position of the X and Y jaw highly influences the output factors of the small field. It also confirms that the output factor highly depends on the configuration of X and Y jaw settings, the tertiary collimating system as well as the orientation of the detectors in small fields.

References
1.
Leybovich L, Sethi A, Dogan N . Comparison of ionization chambers of various volumes for IMRT absolute dose verification. Med Phys. 2003; 30(2):119-23. DOI: 10.1118/1.1536161. View

2.
Sauer O, Wilbert J . Measurement of output factors for small photon beams. Med Phys. 2007; 34(6):1983-8. DOI: 10.1118/1.2734383. View

3.
Russo S, Masi L, Francescon P, Cristina Frassanito M, Fumagalli M, Marinelli M . Multicenter evaluation of a synthetic single-crystal diamond detector for CyberKnife small field size output factors. Phys Med. 2016; 32(4):575-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.005. View

4.
Tyler M, Liu P, Chan K, Ralston A, McKenzie D, Downes S . Characterization of small-field stereotactic radiosurgery beams with modern detectors. Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(21):7595-608. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/21/7595. View

5.
Moignier C, Huet C, Makovicka L . Determination of the KQclinfclin,Qmsr fmsr correction factors for detectors used with an 800 MU/min CyberKnife(®) system equipped with fixed collimators and a study of detector response to small photon beams using a Monte Carlo method. Med Phys. 2014; 41(7):071702. DOI: 10.1118/1.4881098. View