» Articles » PMID: 38814746

Impact of Physical Activity Frequency, Duration, and Intensity on Senile Cataract Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to determine the causal effects of physical activities with different frequencies, durations, and intensities on the risk of senile cataracts using Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods: A bidirectional two-sample MR approach was used to determine the association between physical activity and senile cataract risk. Our primary analysis used the inverse variance weighted method, and secondary analyses included MR-Egger regression, MR-PRESSO, and Cochran's Q statistic to evaluate heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Causal estimates were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results: Genetically predicted moderate physical activity ≥ 10 min/wk (OR = 0.765, 95% CI = 0.627-0.936, P = 8.73E-03), vigorous physical activity ≥ 10 min/wk (OR = 0.691, 95% CI = 0.521-0.917, P = 1.04E-02), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels (OR = 0.552, 95% CI = 0.369-0.823, P = 3.75E-03), and overall acceleration average (OR = 0.952, 95% CI = 0.926-0.978, P = 3.80E-04) were associated with a decreased risk of senile cataract while walking ≥ 10 min/wk (OR = 0.972, 95% CI = 0.741-1.275, P = 8.36E-01) had no significant correlation. The reverse MR analysis showed no reversal causality from senile cataract to physical activity except for walking ≥ 10 min/wk (OR = 0.951, 95% CI = 0.923-0.979, P = 7.30E-04).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that moderate to vigorous physical activity with higher frequency and longer duration will causally reduce the risk of senile cataracts, and there is no reverse causal relationship.

Translational Relevance: These findings underscore the potential of incorporating physical activity into preventive health strategies for senile cataracts.

References
1.
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock P, Burgess S . Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016; 40(4):304-14. PMC: 4849733. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21965. View

2.
Slob E, Burgess S . A comparison of robust Mendelian randomization methods using summary data. Genet Epidemiol. 2020; 44(4):313-329. PMC: 7317850. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22295. View

3.
Ekelund U, Sepp H, Brage S, Becker W, Jakes R, Hennings M . Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Swedish adults. Public Health Nutr. 2006; 9(2):258-65. DOI: 10.1079/phn2005840. View

4.
Fry A, Littlejohns T, Sudlow C, Doherty N, Adamska L, Sprosen T . Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population. Am J Epidemiol. 2017; 186(9):1026-1034. PMC: 5860371. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx246. View

5.
Wang Y, Wei W, Xu L, Jonas J . Physical activity and eye diseases. The Beijing Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018; 97(3):325-331. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13962. View