» Articles » PMID: 38807524

Human Midtarsal and Subtalar Joint Kinematics During Walking, Running and Hopping

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The interaction among joints of the midtarsal complex and subtalar joint is important for locomotor function; however, its complexity poses substantial challenges in quantifying the joints' motions. We determine the mobility of these joints across locomotion tasks and investigate the influence of individual talus morphology on their motion. Using highly accurate biplanar videoradiography, three-dimensional bone kinematics were captured during walking, running and hopping. We calculated the axis of rotation of the midtarsal complex and subtalar joint for the landing and push-off phases. A comparison was made between these rotation axes and the morphological subtalar axis. Measurement included total rotation about and the orientation of the rotation axes in the direction of the subtalar joint and its deviation via spatial angles for both phases. The rotation axes of all three bones relative to the talus closely align with the morphological subtalar axis. This suggests that the midtarsal and subtalar joints' motions might be described by one commonly oriented axis. Despite having such an axis, the location of the axes and ranges of motion differed among the bones. Our results provide a novel perspective of healthy foot function across different sagittal plane-dominant locomotion tasks underscoring the importance of quantifying midtarsal complex and subtalar motion while accounting for an individual's talus morphology.

Citing Articles

Human midtarsal and subtalar joint kinematics during walking, running and hopping.

Behling A, Welte L, Kelly L, Rainbow M J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(214):20240074.

PMID: 38807524 PMC: 11285814. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0074.

References
1.
Arndt A, Westblad P, Winson I, Hashimoto T, Lundberg A . Ankle and subtalar kinematics measured with intracortical pins during the stance phase of walking. Foot Ankle Int. 2004; 25(5):357-64. DOI: 10.1177/107110070402500514. View

2.
Brainerd E, Baier D, Gatesy S, Hedrick T, Metzger K, Gilbert S . X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2010; 313(5):262-79. DOI: 10.1002/jez.589. View

3.
Knorlein B, Baier D, Gatesy S, Laurence-Chasen J, Brainerd E . Validation of XMALab software for marker-based XROMM. J Exp Biol. 2016; 219(Pt 23):3701-3711. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.145383. View

4.
Arndt A, Wolf P, Liu A, Nester C, Stacoff A, Jones R . Intrinsic foot kinematics measured in vivo during the stance phase of slow running. J Biomech. 2007; 40(12):2672-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.12.009. View

5.
Behling A, Rainbow M, Welte L, Kelly L . Chasing footprints in time - reframing our understanding of human foot function in the context of current evidence and emerging insights. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023; 98(6):2136-2151. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12999. View