» Articles » PMID: 38804103

Information-seeking Behaviour of Primary Care Clinicians in Singapore at the Point-of-care: A Qualitative Study

Overview
Date 2024 May 28
PMID 38804103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinicians' information-seeking behaviours impact patient care quality. Earlier studies indicated that barriers to accessing information deter clinicians from seeking answers to clinical questions.

Objectives: To explore primary care clinicians' information-seeking behaviour at point-of-care, focusing on when and how they seek answers to clinical questions.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 45 clinicians after clinical sessions to investigate their information-seeking habits. Follow-up interviews were conducted after a week for those intending to address unanswered queries.

Results: Two thirds of clinicians encountered questions during care, with nearly three quarters resolving them during the session. Colleagues, guidelines and online platforms were common information sources, with smartphones being used to access Google, WhatsApp or UpToDate®. Facilitators included reliable sources and the drive to confirm knowledge, while barriers included ineffective search methods and high workload. Despite challenges, most clinicians expressed satisfaction with their information-seeking process.

Discussion: The findings underscore the increasing use of smartphones for accessing clinical information among Singaporean primary care clinicians and suggest the need for tailored training programmes and guidelines to optimise information-seeking practices.

Conclusion: Insights from this study can inform the development of training programmes and guidelines aimed at improving information-seeking practices among primary care clinicians, potentially enhancing patient care quality.

Citing Articles

Information-seeking behaviour of primary care clinicians in Singapore at the point-of-care: A qualitative study.

Lee M, Tang W, Smith H, Tudor Car L Health Info Libr J. 2024; 41(4):418-428.

PMID: 38804103 PMC: 11649596. DOI: 10.1111/hir.12535.

References
1.
Kang H . How to understand and conduct evidence-based medicine. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016; 69(5):435-445. PMC: 5047978. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.5.435. View

2.
Gask L, Dixon C, May C, Dowrick C . Qualitative study of an educational intervention for GPs in the assessment and management of depression. Br J Gen Pract. 2005; 55(520):854-9. PMC: 1570781. View

3.
Scott S, Grimshaw J, Klassen T, Nettel-Aguirre A, Johnson D . Understanding implementation processes of clinical pathways and clinical practice guidelines in pediatric contexts: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011; 6:133. PMC: 3268729. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-133. View

4.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

5.
Bruin-Huisman L, Abu-Hanna A, van Weert H, Beers E . Potentially inappropriate prescribing to older patients in primary care in the Netherlands: a retrospective longitudinal study. Age Ageing. 2017; 46(4):614-619. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afw243. View