» Articles » PMID: 38793041

Delayed Orbital Floor Reconstruction Using Mirroring Technique and Patient-Specific Implants: Proof of Concept

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2024 May 25
PMID 38793041
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Enophthalmos is a severe complication of primary reconstruction following orbital floor fractures, oncological resections, or maxillo-facial syndromes. The goal of secondary orbital reconstruction is to regain a symmetrical globe position to restore function and aesthetics. In this article, we present a method of computer-assisted orbital floor reconstruction using a mirroring technique and a custom-made titanium or high-density polyethylene mesh printed using computer-aided manufacturing techniques. This reconstructive protocol involves four steps: mirroring of the healthy orbit computer tomography files at the contralateral affected site, virtual design of a customized implant, computer-assisted manufacturing (CAM) of the implant using Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) or Computer Numerical Control (CNC) methods, and surgical insertion of the device. Clinical outcomes were assessed using 3dMD photogrammetry and computed tomography measures in 13 treated patients and compared to a control group treated with stock implants. An improvement of 3.04 mm (range 0.3-6 mm) in globe protrusion was obtained for the patients treated with patient-specific implants (PSI), and no major complications have been registered. The technique described here appears to be a viable method for correcting complex orbital floor defects needing delayed reconstruction.

References
1.
Lee S, Maronian N, Most S, Whipple M, McCulloch T, Stanley R . Porous high-density polyethylene for orbital reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 131(5):446-50. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.131.5.446. View

2.
Leiggener C, Messo E, Thor A, Zeilhofer H, Hirsch J . A selective laser sintering guide for transferring a virtual plan to real time surgery in composite mandibular reconstruction with free fibula osseous flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38(2):187-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.11.026. View

3.
Haug R, Kimberly D, Bradrick J . A comparison of microscrew and suture fixation for porous high-density polyethylene orbital floor implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 51(11):1217-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80292-7. View

4.
Tarsitano A, Battaglia S, Ricotta F, Bortolani B, Cercenelli L, Marcelli E . Accuracy of CAD/CAM mandibular reconstruction: A three-dimensional, fully virtual outcome evaluation method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018; 46(7):1121-1125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.010. View

5.
Seen S, Young S, Lang S, Lim T, Amrith S, Sundar G . Orbital Implants in Orbital Fracture Reconstruction: A Ten-Year Series. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2021; 14(1):56-63. PMC: 7868517. DOI: 10.1177/1943387520939032. View