» Articles » PMID: 29802055

Accuracy of CAD/CAM Mandibular Reconstruction: A Three-dimensional, Fully Virtual Outcome Evaluation Method

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2018 May 27
PMID 29802055
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) methods for mandibular reconstruction have improved both functional and morphological results. We evaluated the accuracy of the CAD/CAM method for mandibular reconstruction and assessed the quantitative and qualitative reproducibility of virtual preoperative planning.

Materials And Methods: A total of 34 consecutive patients treated with mandibular reconstruction using the CAD/CAM method between January 2011 and October 2017 were included in this study. The accuracy of the reconstruction was assessed using the automated Hausdorff distance function of the simulation software, which set the postoperative mesh as the target. This made it possible to calculate the minimum error, the maximum error, and the mean error for each reconstruction in exactly the same way and with the same settings as the difference between the postoperative mesh and virtual planning. Finally, the coloured quality mapper function was applied to superimposition of the STL files, allowing us to visually render the obtained data on differences between preoperative planning and surgical outcome.

Results: The average mean error obtained after performing an accuracy evaluation of our reconstructions was 1 mm (range 0.4-2.46 mm). Based on the colour map areas, the maximum error was located in the symphysis area. The body and ramus areas showed the greatest accuracy in terms of planning reproducibility.

Conclusion: This is the first study to assess the three-dimensional reproducibility of virtual planning using the CAD/CAM method for mandibular reconstruction, in a homogeneous sample of 34 cases. Our data suggest that CAD/CAM microvascular reconstruction can result in a very high degree of reproducibility. This occurs in complex areas as well as the condylar region and in the case of extensive mandibular reconstructions.

Citing Articles

Role of residual mandibular teeth after computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction using a fibular flap.

Kurosawa K, Ohkoshi A, Ishii R, Sato N, Miyashita H, Harata T JPRAS Open. 2024; 42:350-360.

PMID: 39583297 PMC: 11582545. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.002.


Reliabilities of three methods used to evaluate computer-assisted mandibular reconstructions using free fibula flaps.

Bao T, Yu D, Zhu W, He J, Zheng J, Wang H Heliyon. 2024; 10(18):e37725.

PMID: 39309944 PMC: 11416486. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37725.


Computer-Assisted Surgery in Mandible Reconstruction.

Shahzad F Semin Plast Surg. 2024; 38(3):198-208.

PMID: 39118858 PMC: 11305827. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786805.


Segmental Mandibulectomy and Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap Using a 3D Template.

Tatti M, Carta F, Bontempi M, Deriu S, Mariani C, Marrosu V J Pers Med. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38793094 PMC: 11122563. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050512.


Delayed Orbital Floor Reconstruction Using Mirroring Technique and Patient-Specific Implants: Proof of Concept.

DAlpaos D, Badiali G, Ceccariglia F, Tarsitano A J Pers Med. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38793041 PMC: 11122088. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050459.