» Articles » PMID: 38789500

Compliance with the 24-h Movement Guidelines for Portuguese Children: Differences Between Boys and Girls

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 May 24
PMID 38789500
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The 24-h Movement Guidelines for children recommend at least 60 min per day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (PA), ≤ 2 h/day of screen time, and 9-11 h/day of sleep for children. Since little information is available on the 24-h Movement Guidelines in Portuguese children, this research attempts to know the proportion of Portuguese children meeting individual and combinations of these 24-h Movement Guidelines. Another aim of this study is to test sex differences in compliance with 24-h Movement Guidelines. A final sample of 1351 Portuguese children (51.4% girls, aged 7.65 ± 1.21) participated in this cross-sectional study. PA, screen time and sleep duration were parent-reported through a questionnaire. Only 3.7% of children met all three 24-h Movement Guidelines, whereas 11.9% met none. Although boys showed greater compliance with PA recommendations and girls with screen time recommendations, no significant sex differences were found in the compliance of all three 24-h Movement Guidelines. Given that 96.3% of Portuguese children did not meet 24-h Movement Guidelines, promoting these three movement behaviours in both boys and girls is crucial to encouraging positive consequences early.

References
1.
de Brito J, Loth K, Tate A, Berge J . Associations Between Parent Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Children: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(5):e15458. PMC: 7267997. DOI: 10.2196/15458. View

2.
Rollo S, Antsygina O, Tremblay M . The whole day matters: Understanding 24-hour movement guideline adherence and relationships with health indicators across the lifespan. J Sport Health Sci. 2020; 9(6):493-510. PMC: 7749249. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.004. View

3.
Steene-Johannessen J, Hansen B, Dalene K, Kolle E, Northstone K, Moller N . Variations in accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time across Europe - harmonized analyses of 47,497 children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020; 17(1):38. PMC: 7079516. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-00930-x. View

4.
Poitras V, Gray C, Borghese M, Carson V, Chaput J, Janssen I . Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016; 41(6 Suppl 3):S197-239. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663. View

5.
Ferreira R, Nogueira T, Dias da Silva V, Pinto M, Sousa J, Pereira A . A school-based intervention for a better future: study protocol of Sintra Grows Healthy. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):1615. PMC: 7590451. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09715-0. View