» Articles » PMID: 38787892

The Impact of the Parenting for Respectability Programme on Violent Parenting and Intimate Partner Relationships in Uganda: A Pre-post Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 May 24
PMID 38787892
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is a growing need for interventions that reduce both violence against children and intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries. However, few parenting interventions deliberately address this link. We tested the feasibility of a 16-session group-based parenting programme, Parenting for Respectability, in semi-rural Ugandan communities.

Methods: This was a pre-post study with parents and their children (N = 484 parents; 212 children).

Results: Pre-post comparisons found large effects for parent-reported reduced harsh parenting (Cohen's f2 = 0.41 overall; f2 = 0.47 (among session attendees); with an overall reduction of 26% for harsh parenting. Session attendees reported higher reductions than non-attendees (p = 0.014), and male caregivers reported higher reductions than female caregivers (p<0.001). Children also reported reduced harsh parenting by attending fathers (f2 = 0.64 overall; f2 = 0.60) and attending mothers (f2 = 0.56 overall; f2 = 0.51); with reduction in harsh parenting ranging between 27% to 29% in the various categories. Overall, spousal violence reduced by 27% (f2 = 0.19 overall; f2 = 0.26 (among session attendees). Both parents and children reported reduced dysfunctional parent relationships; parents: f2 = 0.19 overall; f2 = 0.26 (among session attendees); and children: f2 = 0.35 overall; f2 = 0.32 (for attending parents); with reductions ranging between 22% to 28%. Parents who attended more than 50% of the program reported greater effects on reduced dysfunctional relationships than those who attended less than half of the program (B = -0.74, p = 0.013). All secondary outcomes were improved with f2 ranging between 0.08 and 0.39; and improvements ranging between 6% and 28%.

Conclusion: Results suggest the importance of more rigorous testing to determine program effectiveness.

References
1.
Tavakol M, Dennick R . Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2016; 2:53-55. PMC: 4205511. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. View

2.
Heise L, Kotsadam A . Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015; 3(6):e332-40. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00013-3. View

3.
Starmann E, Heise L, Kyegombe N, Devries K, Abramsky T, Michau L . Examining diffusion to understand the how of SASA!, a violence against women and HIV prevention intervention in Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):616. PMC: 5948738. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5508-4. View

4.
Kyegombe N, Abramsky T, Devries K, Michau L, Nakuti J, Starmann E . What is the potential for interventions designed to prevent violence against women to reduce children's exposure to violence? Findings from the SASA! study, Kampala, Uganda. Child Abuse Negl. 2015; 50:128-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.003. View

5.
Ravi S, Ahluwalia R . What explains childhood violence? Micro correlates from VACS surveys. Psychol Health Med. 2017; 22(sup1):17-30. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1282162. View