» Articles » PMID: 12571345

Research Designs for Studies Evaluating the Effectiveness of Change and Improvement Strategies

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2003 Feb 7
PMID 12571345
Citations 209
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The methods of evaluating change and improvement strategies are not well described. The design and conduct of a range of experimental and non-experimental quantitative designs are considered. Such study designs should usually be used in a context where they build on appropriate theoretical, qualitative and modelling work, particularly in the development of appropriate interventions. A range of experimental designs are discussed including single and multiple arm randomised controlled trials and the use of more complex factorial and block designs. The impact of randomisation at both group and individual levels and three non-experimental designs (uncontrolled before and after, controlled before and after, and time series analysis) are also considered. The design chosen will reflect both the needs (and resources) in any particular circumstances and also the purpose of the evaluation. The general principle underlying the choice of evaluative design is, however, simple-those conducting such evaluations should use the most robust design possible to minimise bias and maximise generalisability.

Citing Articles

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of community treatment orders on aggression or criminal behaviour in people with a mental illness.

Kisely S, Bull C, Gill N Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2025; 34:e12.

PMID: 39972594 PMC: 11886974. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025000058.


Exploring the utility of N-acetylcysteine for loss of control eating: protocol of an open-label single-arm pilot study.

Muthmainah M, Sketriene D, Anversa R, Harris E, Griffiths S, Gogos A Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025; 11(1):19.

PMID: 39972374 PMC: 11837714. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-025-01598-5.


Prevention of unplanned extubation in neonatal patients: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pontes L, Pimenta I, de Medeiros G, Guillen-Martinez D, Echevarria-Perez P, Piuvezam G PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0314201.

PMID: 39787058 PMC: 11717187. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314201.


Care bundles to improve enteral nutrition management in stroke patients: study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.

Wang C, Liu S, Jia S, Yan C, Zhang X, Liu Y Trials. 2024; 25(1):795.

PMID: 39587615 PMC: 11587749. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08645-1.


Effect of the Green Cross method on patient safety culture in a postanaesthesia care unit: a longitudinal quasi-experimental study.

Birkeli G, Thomas O, Deilkas E, Ballangrud R, Lindahl A BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 39357924 PMC: 11448200. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002964.


References
1.
Eccles M, Steen N, Grimshaw J, Thomas L, McNamee P, Soutter J . Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001; 357(9266):1406-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04564-5. View

2.
Mollison J, Simpson J, Campbell M, Grimshaw J . Comparison of analytical methods for cluster randomised trials: an example from a primary care setting. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2001; 5(6):339-48. View

3.
Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth A, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D . Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000; 321(7262):694-6. PMC: 1118564. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694. View

4.
Campbell M, Mollison J, Steen N, Grimshaw J, Eccles M . Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: a practical approach. Fam Pract. 2000; 17(2):192-6. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.192. View

5.
Flynn T, Whitley E, Peters T . Recruitment strategies in a cluster randomized trial--cost implications. Stat Med. 2002; 21(3):397-405. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1025. View