» Articles » PMID: 38782865

Study of Late Toxicity Biomarkers of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy Plus Cisplatin or Cetuximab Points to the Relevance of Skin Macrophages (TOX-TTCC-2015-01)

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 May 23
PMID 38782865
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant cisplatin (CRT) or cetuximab (ERT) are accepted treatment options for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). Long-term adverse events (AEs) have a vast impact on patients' quality of life. This study explored tissue biomarkers which could help predict late toxicity.

Methods/patients: Single-institution prospective study including patients aged ≥ 18 with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed LA-SCCHN treated with RT and either concomitant cisplatin q3w or weekly cetuximab, according to institutional protocols. All patients underwent pre- and post-treatment skin biopsies of neck regions included in the clinical target volume. Angiogenesis, macrophages, and extracellular matrix (ECM) markers were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results: From April 15, 2016, to December 11, 2017; 31 patients were evaluated [CRT = 12 (38.7%) and ERT = 19 (61.3%)]. 27 patients (87%) had received induction chemotherapy. All patients finished RT as planned. IHC expression of vasculature (CD34) and collagen (Masson's Trichrome) did not differ significantly between and within CRT and ERT arms. Conversely, an increased CD68 and CD163 macrophage infiltration expression was observed after treatment, without significant impact of treatment modality. Patients with higher late toxicity showed lower expression of macrophage markers in pre-treatment samples compared with those with lower late toxicity, with statistically significant differences for CD68.

Conclusions: Angiogenesis and ECM biomarkers did not differ significantly between CRT and ERT. Macrophage markers increased after both treatments and deserve further investigation as predictors of late toxicity in LA-SCCHN patients. [Protocol code: TOX-TTCC-2015-01/Spanish registry of clinical studies (REec): 2015-003012-21/Date of registration: 27/01/2016].

References
1.
Ottery F . Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology. Nutrition. 1996; 12(1 Suppl):S15-9. DOI: 10.1016/0899-9007(96)90011-8. View

2.
Bang C, Bernard G, Le W, Lalonde A, Kadoury S, Bahig H . Artificial intelligence to predict outcomes of head and neck radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023; 39:100590. PMC: 10014342. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100590. View

3.
Fanetti G, Polesel J, Fratta E, Muraro E, Lupato V, Alfieri S . Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Toxicity in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy in Association with Chemotherapy. Nutrients. 2021; 13(4). PMC: 8070136. DOI: 10.3390/nu13041277. View

4.
Gillison M, Trotti A, Harris J, Eisbruch A, Harari P, Adelstein D . Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018; 393(10166):40-50. PMC: 6541928. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32779-X. View

5.
Autio P, Saarto T, Tenhunen M, Elomaa I, Risteli J, Lahtinen T . Demonstration of increased collagen synthesis in irradiated human skin in vivo. Br J Cancer. 1998; 77(12):2331-5. PMC: 2150405. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.387. View