» Articles » PMID: 18559875

Factors Associated with Severe Late Toxicity After Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: an RTOG Analysis

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2008 Jun 19
PMID 18559875
Citations 441
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) increases both local tumor control and toxicity. This study evaluates clinical factors that are associated with and might predict severe late toxicity after CCRT.

Methods: Patients were analyzed from a subset of three previously reported Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials of CCRT for locally advanced SCCHN (RTOG 91-11, 97-03, and 99-14). Severe late toxicity was defined in this secondary analysis as chronic grade 3 to 4 pharyngeal/laryngeal toxicity (RTOG/European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer late toxicity scoring system) and/or requirement for a feeding tube >or= 2 years after registration and/or potential treatment-related death (eg, pneumonia) within 3 years. Case-control analysis was performed, with a multivariable logistic regression model that included pretreatment and treatment potential factors.

Results: A total of 230 patients were assessable for this analysis: 99 patients with severe late toxicities and 131 controls; thus, 43% of assessable patients had a severe late toxicity. On multivariable analysis, significant variables correlated with the development of severe late toxicity were older age (odds ratio 1.05 per year; P = .001); advanced T stage (odds ratio, 3.07; P = .0036); larynx/hypopharynx primary site (odds ratio, 4.17; P = .0041); and neck dissection after CRT (odds ratio, 2.39; P = .018).

Conclusion: Severe late toxicity after CCRT is common. Older age, advanced T-stage, and larynx/hypopharynx primary site were strong independent risk factors. Neck dissection after CCRT was associated with an increased risk of these complications.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the Effect of Weekly Cisplatin Versus Three Weekly Cisplatin in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Chaturvedi A, Sehrawat A, Mopidevi T, Parthasarthy K, Gupta D, Singh A Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025; 77(1):356-370.

PMID: 40070996 PMC: 11890838. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-05190-w.


Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Response-Stratified Chemoradiation Therapy in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer: The DEPEND Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Rosenberg A, Juloori A, Jelinek M, Agrawal N, Cursio J, Cipriani N JAMA Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 40048190 PMC: 11886870. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0081.


Safety and efficacy of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in patients with head and neck cancer: a multicenter, prospective, observational, real-world study.

Cheng G, Chen Y, Xu N, Mao C, Zhang N, Chen M Transl Cancer Res. 2025; 13(12):6895-6904.

PMID: 39816534 PMC: 11730191. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-2035.


Treatment-related mortality in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation: results of a meta-analysis of published trials.

Gurizzan C, Cinquini M, Legramandi L, Resteghini C, Siano M, Bergamini C Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025; 17():17588359241288251.

PMID: 39801611 PMC: 11724409. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241288251.


DNA double-strand break repair capacity and normal tissue toxicity induced by radiotherapy.

Nishibuchi I, Tashiro S J Radiat Res. 2024; 65(Supplement_1):i52-i56.

PMID: 39679883 PMC: 11647926. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae081.


References
1.
Staar S, Rudat V, Stuetzer H, Dietz A, Volling P, Schroeder M . Intensified hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy limits the additional benefit of simultaneous chemotherapy--results of a multicentric randomized German trial in advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 50(5):1161-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01544-9. View

2.
Feng F, Kim H, Lyden T, Haxer M, Feng M, Worden F . Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head and neck cancer aiming to reduce dysphagia: early dose-effect relationships for the swallowing structures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 68(5):1289-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.049. View

3.
Bourhis J, Le Maitre A, Baujat B, Audry H, Pignon J . Individual patients' data meta-analyses in head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007; 19(3):188-94. DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3280f01010. View

4.
Bentzen S, Vaeth M, Pedersen D, Overgaard J . Why actuarial estimates should be used in reporting late normal-tissue effects of cancer treatment ... now!. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995; 32(5):1531-4. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00262-W. View

5.
Greenberger J, Epperly M . Review. Antioxidant gene therapeutic approaches to normal tissue radioprotection and tumor radiosensitization. In Vivo. 2007; 21(2):141-6. View