» Articles » PMID: 38778103

Mapping Model Units to Visual Neurons Reveals Population Code for Social Behaviour

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2024 May 22
PMID 38778103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The rich variety of behaviours observed in animals arises through the interplay between sensory processing and motor control. To understand these sensorimotor transformations, it is useful to build models that predict not only neural responses to sensory input but also how each neuron causally contributes to behaviour. Here we demonstrate a novel modelling approach to identify a one-to-one mapping between internal units in a deep neural network and real neurons by predicting the behavioural changes that arise from systematic perturbations of more than a dozen neuronal cell types. A key ingredient that we introduce is 'knockout training', which involves perturbing the network during training to match the perturbations of the real neurons during behavioural experiments. We apply this approach to model the sensorimotor transformations of Drosophila melanogaster males during a complex, visually guided social behaviour. The visual projection neurons at the interface between the optic lobe and central brain form a set of discrete channels, and prior work indicates that each channel encodes a specific visual feature to drive a particular behaviour. Our model reaches a different conclusion: combinations of visual projection neurons, including those involved in non-social behaviours, drive male interactions with the female, forming a rich population code for behaviour. Overall, our framework consolidates behavioural effects elicited from various neural perturbations into a single, unified model, providing a map from stimulus to neuronal cell type to behaviour, and enabling future incorporation of wiring diagrams of the brain into the model.

Citing Articles

Building egocentric models of local space from retinal input.

Martins D, Manda J, Goard M, Parker P Curr Biol. 2024; 34(23):R1185-R1202.

PMID: 39626632 PMC: 11620475. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.057.


NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila.

Wang-Chen S, Stimpfling V, Lam T, Ozdil P, Genoud L, Hurtak F Nat Methods. 2024; 21(12):2353-2362.

PMID: 39533006 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02497-y.


The fly connectome reveals a path to the effectome.

Pospisil D, Aragon M, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Sterling A, Schlegel P Nature. 2024; 634(8032):201-209.

PMID: 39358526 PMC: 11446844. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07982-0.


Morphology and synapse topography optimize linear encoding of synapse numbers in looming responsive descending neurons.

Moreno-Sanchez A, Vasserman A, Jang H, Hina B, von Reyn C, Ausborn J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38712267 PMC: 11071487. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.24.591016.

References
1.
Yamins D, DiCarlo J . Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2016; 19(3):356-65. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4244. View

2.
Sussillo D, Churchland M, Kaufman M, Shenoy K . A neural network that finds a naturalistic solution for the production of muscle activity. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(7):1025-33. PMC: 5113297. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4042. View

3.
Richards B, Lillicrap T, Beaudoin P, Bengio Y, Bogacz R, Christensen A . A deep learning framework for neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2019; 22(11):1761-1770. PMC: 7115933. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0520-2. View

4.
Butts D . Data-Driven Approaches to Understanding Visual Neuron Activity. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2019; 5:451-477. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-091718-014731. View

5.
Mano O, Creamer M, Badwan B, Clark D . Predicting individual neuron responses with anatomically constrained task optimization. Curr Biol. 2021; 31(18):4062-4075.e4. PMC: 8741219. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.090. View