» Articles » PMID: 31659335

A Deep Learning Framework for Neuroscience

Abstract

Systems neuroscience seeks explanations for how the brain implements a wide variety of perceptual, cognitive and motor tasks. Conversely, artificial intelligence attempts to design computational systems based on the tasks they will have to solve. In artificial neural networks, the three components specified by design are the objective functions, the learning rules and the architectures. With the growing success of deep learning, which utilizes brain-inspired architectures, these three designed components have increasingly become central to how we model, engineer and optimize complex artificial learning systems. Here we argue that a greater focus on these components would also benefit systems neuroscience. We give examples of how this optimization-based framework can drive theoretical and experimental progress in neuroscience. We contend that this principled perspective on systems neuroscience will help to generate more rapid progress.

Citing Articles

A unified acoustic-to-speech-to-language embedding space captures the neural basis of natural language processing in everyday conversations.

Goldstein A, Wang H, Niekerken L, Schain M, Zada Z, Aubrey B Nat Hum Behav. 2025; .

PMID: 40055549 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02105-9.


Unraveling the complexity of rat object vision requires a full convolutional network and beyond.

Muratore P, Alemi A, Zoccolan D Patterns (N Y). 2025; 6(2):101149.

PMID: 40041851 PMC: 11873012. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.101149.


A bibliometric analysis of studies on artificial intelligence in neuroscience.

Tekin U, Dener M Front Neurol. 2025; 16:1474484.

PMID: 40040909 PMC: 11877006. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1474484.


Approximating Human-Level 3D Visual Inferences With Deep Neural Networks.

OConnell T, Bonnen T, Friedman Y, Tewari A, Sitzmann V, Tenenbaum J Open Mind (Camb). 2025; 9:305-324.

PMID: 40013087 PMC: 11864798. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00189.


Three systems of circuit formation: assembly, updating and tuning.

Barabasi D, Ferreira Castro A, Engert F Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025; .

PMID: 39994473 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-025-00910-9.


References
1.
Bittner K, Milstein A, Grienberger C, Romani S, Magee J . Behavioral time scale synaptic plasticity underlies CA1 place fields. Science. 2017; 357(6355):1033-1036. PMC: 7289271. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan3846. View

2.
Poirazi P, Brannon T, Mel B . Pyramidal neuron as two-layer neural network. Neuron. 2003; 37(6):989-99. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00149-1. View

3.
Vogels T, Rajan K, Abbott L . Neural network dynamics. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005; 28:357-76. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135637. View

4.
Yagishita S, Hayashi-Takagi A, Ellis-Davies G, Urakubo H, Ishii S, Kasai H . A critical time window for dopamine actions on the structural plasticity of dendritic spines. Science. 2014; 345(6204):1616-20. PMC: 4225776. DOI: 10.1126/science.1255514. View

5.
Mathis A, Mamidanna P, Cury K, Abe T, Murthy V, Mathis M . DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat Neurosci. 2018; 21(9):1281-1289. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y. View