» Articles » PMID: 38777219

Brain Health in Diverse Settings: How Age, Demographics and Cognition Shape Brain Function

Abstract

Diversity in brain health is influenced by individual differences in demographics and cognition. However, most studies on brain health and diseases have typically controlled for these factors rather than explored their potential to predict brain signals. Here, we assessed the role of individual differences in demographics (age, sex, and education; n = 1298) and cognition (n = 725) as predictors of different metrics usually used in case-control studies. These included power spectrum and aperiodic (1/f slope, knee, offset) metrics, as well as complexity (fractal dimension estimation, permutation entropy, Wiener entropy, spectral structure variability) and connectivity (graph-theoretic mutual information, conditional mutual information, organizational information) from the source space resting-state EEG activity in a diverse sample from the global south and north populations. Brain-phenotype models were computed using EEG metrics reflecting local activity (power spectrum and aperiodic components) and brain dynamics and interactions (complexity and graph-theoretic measures). Electrophysiological brain dynamics were modulated by individual differences despite the varied methods of data acquisition and assessments across multiple centers, indicating that results were unlikely to be accounted for by methodological discrepancies. Variations in brain signals were mainly influenced by age and cognition, while education and sex exhibited less importance. Power spectrum activity and graph-theoretic measures were the most sensitive in capturing individual differences. Older age, poorer cognition, and being male were associated with reduced alpha power, whereas older age and less education were associated with reduced network integration and segregation. Findings suggest that basic individual differences impact core metrics of brain function that are used in standard case-control studies. Considering individual variability and diversity in global settings would contribute to a more tailored understanding of brain function.

Citing Articles

Altered spatiotemporal brain dynamics of interoception in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia.

Hazelton J, Della Bella G, Barttfeld P, Dottori M, Gonzalez-Gomez R, Migeot J EBioMedicine. 2025; 113:105614.

PMID: 39987747 PMC: 11894334. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105614.


Temporal autocorrelation is predictive of age-An extensive MEG time-series analysis.

Stier C, Balestrieri E, Fehring J, Focke N, Wollbrink A, Dannlowski U Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(8):e2411098122.

PMID: 39977317 PMC: 11873822. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2411098122.


Structural inequality linked to brain volume and network dynamics in aging and dementia across the Americas.

Legaz A, Altschuler F, Gonzalez-Gomez R, Hernandez H, Baez S, Migeot J Nat Aging. 2024; 5(2):259-274.

PMID: 39730822 DOI: 10.1038/s43587-024-00781-2.


Structural inequality and temporal brain dynamics across diverse samples.

Baez S, Hernandez H, Moguilner S, Cuadros J, Santamaria-Garcia H, Medel V Clin Transl Med. 2024; 14(10):e70032.

PMID: 39360669 PMC: 11447638. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70032.


Brain clocks capture diversity and disparities in aging and dementia across geographically diverse populations.

Moguilner S, Baez S, Hernandez H, Migeot J, Legaz A, Gonzalez-Gomez R Nat Med. 2024; 30(12):3646-3657.

PMID: 39187698 PMC: 11645278. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03209-x.


References
1.
Klimesch W . EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999; 29(2-3):169-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3. View

2.
Shumbayawonda E, Tosun P, Fernandez A, Hughes M, Abasolo D . Complexity Changes in Brain Activity in Healthy Ageing: A Permutation Lempel-Ziv Complexity Study of Magnetoencephalograms. Entropy (Basel). 2020; 20(7). PMC: 7513026. DOI: 10.3390/e20070506. View

3.
Gaal Z, Boha R, Stam C, Molnar M . Age-dependent features of EEG-reactivity--spectral, complexity, and network characteristics. Neurosci Lett. 2010; 479(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.037. View

4.
Stacey J, Crook-Rumsey M, Sumich A, Howard C, Crawford T, Livne K . Age differences in resting state EEG and their relation to eye movements and cognitive performance. Neuropsychologia. 2021; 157:107887. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107887. View

5.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View