» Articles » PMID: 38771099

Differences in Racial and Ethnic Disparities Between First and Repeat Kidney Transplantation

Overview
Journal Transplantation
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 May 21
PMID 38771099
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recent data suggest patients with graft failure had better access to repeat kidney transplantation (re-KT) than transplant-naive dialysis accessing first KT. This was postulated to be because of better familiarity with the transplant process and healthcare system; whether this advantage is equitably distributed is not known. We compared the magnitude of racial/ethnic disparities in access to re-KT versus first KT.

Methods: Using United States Renal Data System, we identified 104 454 White, Black, and Hispanic patients with a history of graft failure from 1995 to 2018, and 2 357 753 transplant-naive dialysis patients. We used adjusted Cox regression to estimate disparities in access to first and re-KT and whether the magnitude of these disparities differed between first and re-KT using a Wald test.

Results: Black patients had inferior access to both waitlisting and receiving first KT and re-KT. However, the racial/ethnic disparities in waitlisting for (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.80) and receiving re-KT (aHR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.58-0.64) was greater than the racial/ethnic disparities in first KT (waitlisting: aHR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93; Pinteraction  = 0.001; KT: aHR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.64-0.72; Pinteraction < 0.001). For Hispanic patients, ethnic disparities in waitlisting for re-KT (aHR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88) were greater than for first KT (aHR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.11-1.16; Pinteraction  < 0.001). However, the disparity in receiving re-KT (aHR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.80) was similar to that for first KT (aHR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.79; Pinteraction  = 0.55). Inferences were similar when restricting the cohorts to the Kidney Allocation System era.

Conclusions: Unlike White patients, Black and Hispanic patients with graft failure do not experience improved access to re-KT. This suggests that structural and systemic barriers likely persist for racialized patients accessing re-KT, and systemic changes are needed to achieve transplant equity.

References
1.
Kernodle A, Thompson V, Chen X, Norman S, Segev D, Purnell T . Short Report: Race and Ethnicity Misclassification in Kidney Transplantation Research. Transplant Direct. 2022; 8(10):e1373. PMC: 9529064. DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001373. View

2.
Epstein A, Ayanian J, Keogh J, Noonan S, Armistead N, Cleary P . Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation--clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse?. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(21):1537-44, 2 p preceding 1537. PMC: 4598055. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432106. View

3.
Patzer R, Perryman J, Schrager J, Pastan S, Amaral S, Gazmararian J . The role of race and poverty on steps to kidney transplantation in the Southeastern United States. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12(2):358-68. PMC: 3950902. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03927.x. View

4.
Purnell T, Luo X, Kucirka L, Cooper L, Crews D, Massie A . Reduced Racial Disparity in Kidney Transplant Outcomes in the United States from 1990 to 2012. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 27(8):2511-8. PMC: 4978037. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2015030293. View

5.
Patzer R, Amaral S, Klein M, Kutner N, Perryman J, Gazmararian J . Racial disparities in pediatric access to kidney transplantation: does socioeconomic status play a role?. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12(2):369-78. PMC: 3951009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03888.x. View