» Articles » PMID: 11087884

Racial Disparities in Access to Renal Transplantation--clinically Appropriate or Due to Underuse or Overuse?

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2000 Nov 23
PMID 11087884
Citations 175
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite abundant evidence of racial disparities in the use of surgical procedures, it is uncertain whether these disparities reflect racial differences in clinical appropriateness or overuse or underuse of inappropriate care.

Methods: We performed a literature review and used an expert panel to develop criteria for determining the appropriateness of renal transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease. Using data from five states and the District of Columbia on patients who had started to undergo dialysis in 1996 or 1997, we selected a random sample of 1518 patients (age range, 18 to 54 years), stratified according to race and sex. We classified the appropriateness of patients as data on candidates for transplantation and analyzed rates of referral to a transplantation center for evaluation, placement on a waiting list, and receipt of a transplant according to race.

Results: Black patients were less likely than white patients to be rated as appropriate candidates for transplantation according to appropriateness criteria based on expert opinion (71 blacks [9.0 percent] vs. 152 whites [20.9 percent]) and were more likely to have had incomplete evaluations (368 [46.5 percent] vs. 282 [38.8 percent], P<0.001 for the overall chi-square). Among patients considered to be appropriate candidates for transplantation, blacks were less likely than whites to be referred for evaluation, according to the chart review (90.1 percent vs. 98.0 percent, P=0.008), to be placed on a waiting list (71.0 percent vs. 86.7 percent, P=0.007), or to undergo transplantation (16.9 percent vs. 52.0 percent, P<0.001). Among patients classified as inappropriate candidates, whites were more likely than blacks to be referred for evaluation (57.8 percent vs. 38.4 percent), to be placed on a waiting list (30.9 percent vs. 17.4 percent), and to undergo transplantation (10.3 percent vs. 2.2 percent, P<0.001 for all three comparisons).

Conclusions: Racial disparities in rates of renal transplantation stem from differences in clinical characteristics that affect appropriateness as well as from underuse of transplantation among blacks and overuse among whites. Reducing racial disparities will require efforts to distinguish their specific causes and the development of interventions tailored to address them.

Citing Articles

Taming the transplant troll: Exploring racial and ethnic disparities in cytomegalovirus infection among kidney transplant patients.

Cabanilla M, Dauenhauer A, St John B, Hill D, Larson J PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317383.

PMID: 39879165 PMC: 11778782. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317383.


The African American Transplant Access Program: Mitigating Disparities in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Simpson D, Obayemi J, Kershaw K, Franklin J, Ladner D NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv. 2024; 5(9).

PMID: 39483970 PMC: 11526762. DOI: 10.1056/CAT.24.0140.


Inconsistent values and algorithmic fairness: a review of organ allocation priority systems in the United States.

Dale R, Cheng M, Pines K, Currie M BMC Med Ethics. 2024; 25(1):115.

PMID: 39420378 PMC: 11483980. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01116-x.


Care of Adults with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

Shrestha S, Haq K, Malhotra D, Patel D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124645 PMC: 11313041. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154378.


A2/A2B Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Using A2 Titers Improves Access to Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Study.

Lum E, Pirzadeh A, Datta N, Lipshutz G, McGonigle A, Hamiduzzaman A Kidney Med. 2024; 6(7):100843.

PMID: 38947773 PMC: 11214338. DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100843.


References
1.
Chassin M, Kosecoff J, Solomon D, Brook R . How coronary angiography is used. Clinical determinants of appropriateness. JAMA. 1987; 258(18):2543-7. View

2.
Held P, Pauly M, Bovbjerg R, Newmann J, Salvatierra Jr O . Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences?. Arch Intern Med. 1988; 148(12):2594-600. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.148.12.2594. View

3.
Port F, Wolfe R, Mauger E, Berling D, Jiang K . Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs cadaveric renal transplant recipients. JAMA. 1993; 270(11):1339-43. View

4.
Whittle J, Conigliaro J, Good C, Lofgren R . Racial differences in the use of invasive cardiovascular procedures in the Department of Veterans Affairs medical system. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(9):621-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199308263290907. View

5.
Hata Y, Cecka J, Takemoto S, Ozawa M, Cho Y, Terasaki P . Effects of changes in the criteria for nationally shared kidney transplants for HLA-matched patients. Transplantation. 1998; 65(2):208-12. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199801270-00011. View