» Articles » PMID: 38763938

Continuing Benefits of the Montreal Protocol and Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone Layer for Human Health and the Environment

Abstract

The protection of Earth's stratospheric ozone (O) is an ongoing process under the auspices of the universally ratified Montreal Protocol and its Amendments and adjustments. A critical part of this process is the assessment of the environmental issues related to changes in O. The United Nations Environment Programme's Environmental Effects Assessment Panel provides annual scientific evaluations of some of the key issues arising in the recent collective knowledge base. This current update includes a comprehensive assessment of the incidence rates of skin cancer, cataract and other skin and eye diseases observed worldwide; the effects of UV radiation on tropospheric oxidants, and air and water quality; trends in breakdown products of fluorinated chemicals and recent information of their toxicity; and recent technological innovations of building materials for greater resistance to UV radiation. These issues span a wide range of topics, including both harmful and beneficial effects of exposure to UV radiation, and complex interactions with climate change. While the Montreal Protocol has succeeded in preventing large reductions in stratospheric O, future changes may occur due to a number of natural and anthropogenic factors. Thus, frequent assessments of potential environmental impacts are essential to ensure that policies remain based on the best available scientific knowledge.

Citing Articles

Increasing solar UV radiation in Dortmund, Germany: data and trend analyses and comparison to Uccle, Belgium.

Lorenz S, Heinzl F, Bauer S, Janssen M, De Bock V, Mangold A Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2024; 23(12):2173-2199.

PMID: 39580782 DOI: 10.1007/s43630-024-00658-8.

References
1.
McKenzie R, Bernhard G, Liley B, Disterhoft P, Rhodes S, Bais A . Success of Montreal Protocol Demonstrated by Comparing High-Quality UV Measurements with "World Avoided" Calculations from Two Chemistry-Climate Models. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):12332. PMC: 6722083. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48625-z. View

2.
Conte S, Ghazawi F, Le M, Nedjar H, Alakel A, Lagace F . Population-Based Study Detailing Cutaneous Melanoma Incidence and Mortality Trends in Canada. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:830254. PMC: 8927870. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.830254. View

3.
van Niekerk C, Otten J, van Rossum M, van den Reek J, Brummelkamp E, Mol M . Trends in three major histological subtypes of cutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2016. Int J Dermatol. 2022; 62(4):508-513. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.16559. View

4.
Cerkauskaite D, Dulskas A, Vincerzevskiene I, Tikuisis R, Urbonas V . Changing epidemiology and age-specific incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma in Lithuania: an analysis of national cancer registration data by gender and anatomical site, 1991-2015. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2023; 26(4):289-293. PMC: 9933352. DOI: 10.5114/wo.2023.124920. View

5.
Venugopal K, Youlden D, Te Marvelde L, Meng R, Aitken J, Evans S . Twenty years of melanoma in Victoria, Queensland, and South Australia (1997 - 2016). Cancer Epidemiol. 2023; 83:102321. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102321. View