» Articles » PMID: 36472871

Melanoma Treatments and Mortality Rate Trends in the US, 1975 to 2019

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Dec 6
PMID 36472871
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Melanoma accounts for most of the deaths due to skin cancer. In the past decade, effective US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies for melanoma have emerged.

Objective: To review changes in the long-term melanoma mortality rate (MMR) trends in the US and determine whether they have any temporal association with the FDA approval of new agents.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study used population data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and retrospectively reviewed the age-adjusted MMR trends in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) from 1975 to 2019 in the US population. The timeline of the FDA approvals for melanoma treatment was also reviewed. Data were analyzed from March 15 to August 15, 2022.

Exposures: Outcomes were assessed in association with FDA approval of drugs for the treatment of melanoma.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Mortality rates are from the SEER database, reported per 100 000 population and age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. The annual percent change (APC) has been used to report long-term trends.

Results: After the introduction of newer treatments in 2011 (most after 2013), a significant reduction in MMR was seen from 2013 to 2017 in the US for the first time in the past 40 years. Rates increased from 1975 to 1988 (APC, 1.65% [95% CI, 1.30%-2.00%]; P < .001). No statistically significant change in MMR was seen from 1988 to 2013 (APC, 0.01% [95% CI, -1.10% to 0.12%]; P = .85). The MMR decreased significantly from 2013 to 2017 (APC, -6.28% [95% CI, -8.52% to -3.97%]; P < .001).

Conclusions And Relevance: These findings suggest a benefit associated with the availability of effective therapies in the past decade and further suggest that the use of new pharmacological therapies is associated with decreased MMR in the US population. These data are very encouraging and support the continued development of such therapies. Additionally, the accessibility of these treatments and the associated health care costs need to be addressed.

Citing Articles

An -Based Biomarker Combination Accurately Predicts Melanoma Patient Survival.

Sanchez-Beltran J, Soler Diaz J, Herraiz C, Olivares C, Cerdido S, Cerezuela-Fuentes P Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40004203 PMC: 11855888. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041739.


Relapse-free survival in a pediatric patient with recurrent EZH2-mutant melanoma treated with adjuvant tazemetostat.

Resch E, Makri S, Ghanem P, Baraban E, Cohen K, Cohen A NPJ Precis Oncol. 2025; 9(1):48.

PMID: 39984702 PMC: 11845573. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-025-00826-8.


Spatial clusters and temporal trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma mortality in Spain.

Cayuela L, Pereyra-Rodriguez J, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Cayuela A J Int Med Res. 2025; 53(2):3000605251319609.

PMID: 39956619 PMC: 11831644. DOI: 10.1177/03000605251319609.


The Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study: a discovery set and validation cohort to predict the absolute risk of distant metastases in stage I/II cutaneous melanoma.

Zhou C, Mooyaart A, Kerkour T, Louwman M, Wakkee M, Li Y Eur J Epidemiol. 2025; 40(1):27-42.

PMID: 39786688 PMC: 11799080. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-024-01188-4.


Paradigm of biomarkers in metastatic melanoma (Review).

Pekarek L, Sanchez Cedra A, Jaudenes Y, Ospino L, Pedrejon B, Bernier L Oncol Lett. 2024; 29(2):78.

PMID: 39650232 PMC: 11622106. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14824.


References
1.
Tawbi H, Schadendorf D, Lipson E, Ascierto P, Matamala L, Castillo Gutierrez E . Relatlimab and Nivolumab versus Nivolumab in Untreated Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386(1):24-34. PMC: 9844513. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109970. View

2.
Andtbacka R, Kaufman H, Collichio F, Amatruda T, Senzer N, Chesney J . Talimogene Laherparepvec Improves Durable Response Rate in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(25):2780-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3377. View

3.
Robert C, Ribas A, Schachter J, Arance A, Grob J, Mortier L . Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(9):1239-1251. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30388-2. View

4.
Weber J, DAngelo S, Minor D, Hodi F, Gutzmer R, Neyns B . Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(4):375-84. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8. View

5.
Eggermont A, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob J, Dummer R, Wolchok J, Schmidt H . Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of stage III melanoma: long-term follow-up results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18071 double-blind phase 3 randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2019; 119:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.001. View