» Articles » PMID: 38762790

Computational Deconvolution of DNA Methylation Data from Mixed DNA Samples

Overview
Journal Brief Bioinform
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 May 19
PMID 38762790
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the different computational tools that have been published for the deconvolution of bulk DNA methylation (DNAm) data. Here, deconvolution refers to the estimation of cell-type proportions that constitute a mixed sample. The paper reviews and compares 25 deconvolution methods (supervised, unsupervised or hybrid) developed between 2012 and 2023 and compares the strengths and limitations of each approach. Moreover, in this study, we describe the impact of the platform used for the generation of methylation data (including microarrays and sequencing), the applied data pre-processing steps and the used reference dataset on the deconvolution performance. Next to reference-based methods, we also examine methods that require only partial reference datasets or require no reference set at all. In this review, we provide guidelines for the use of specific methods dependent on the DNA methylation data type and data availability.

Citing Articles

DNA methylation-based analysis reveals accelerated epigenetic aging in giant cell-enriched adult-type glioblastoma.

Cakmak P, Jurmeister P, Dive I, Zeiner P, Steinbach J, Fenton T Clin Epigenetics. 2024; 16(1):179.

PMID: 39663543 PMC: 11636044. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-024-01793-w.

References
1.
Sompairac N, Nazarov P, Czerwinska U, Cantini L, Biton A, Molkenov A . Independent Component Analysis for Unraveling the Complexity of Cancer Omics Datasets. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(18). PMC: 6771121. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20184414. View

2.
Rahmani E, Schweiger R, Shenhav L, Wingert T, Hofer I, Gabel E . BayesCCE: a Bayesian framework for estimating cell-type composition from DNA methylation without the need for methylation reference. Genome Biol. 2018; 19(1):141. PMC: 6151042. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-018-1513-2. View

3.
McCarthy N, Melton P, Cadby G, Yazar S, Franchina M, Moses E . Meta-analysis of human methylation data for evidence of sex-specific autosomal patterns. BMC Genomics. 2014; 15:981. PMC: 4255932. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-981. View

4.
Onuchic V, Hartmaier R, Boone D, Samuels M, Patel R, White W . Epigenomic Deconvolution of Breast Tumors Reveals Metabolic Coupling between Constituent Cell Types. Cell Rep. 2016; 17(8):2075-2086. PMC: 5115176. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.057. View

5.
Teschendorff A, Relton C . Statistical and integrative system-level analysis of DNA methylation data. Nat Rev Genet. 2017; 19(3):129-147. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.86. View